Games

16370 readers

976 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO

347

Nearly all Nintendo 64 games can now be recompiled into native PC ports to add proper ray tracing, ultrawide, high FPS, and more (www.tomshardware.com)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/games

47 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Gonna explain or just continue to mock me?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Security vulnerabilities are usually tagged as CVE and then some number. So the other dude is basically saying enjoy the security vulnerabilities.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Oh I thought there was some other CVE acronym I was unaware of. I don't think periodically git cloning a repo every few days would be something to worry about. Ever since the Yuzu take down I got in the habit of mirroring a bunch of repos that I'd be very sad to lose, just as a precaution, it probably won't matter, but it's a tiny peace of mind knowing I could at the very least compile it myself if it was lost.

[+] casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer -17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I, quite bluntly, see no good reason to advise an internet stranger on their security practices when they can learn for themselves.

Give a man a fish, he eats for a day. But I've no time to teach strangers the beginnings of fishing, let alone what they need know in order to fish safely.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You're not even giving him a fish let alone teaching him how to fish. Just bitching and moaning about kids these days not knowing how to fish

[–] casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer -4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yes. I am refusing to give a fish, and stating bluntly I have no time or energy to teach them to fish. I acknowledge they need to know how to fish, and was making light of it, now I am adamantly proclaiming that they need to know how and where to fish before they meet an orca.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But you have the time and energy to be a pedantic twat here, apparently

[–] casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yes. That takes SIGNIFICANTLY less time and energy than proper (or even improper) teaching.