Doctor Who Social Club

290 readers

14 users here now

A community for discussing all things Doctor Who.

Rules

1 Be constructive

All posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.

2 Be welcoming

It is important that everyone from newbies to longtime fans feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.

3 Be truthful

All posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.

4 Be nice

If a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.

5 Spoilers

Utilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episode. Spoiler protection will not be granted to information that is out in the mainstream media.

6 Keep on-topic

All submissions must be directly about the DW franchise (the shows, movies, books, etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/Quarks.

7 Meta

Questions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.

Upcoming Episodes

Date	Episode	Title
05-03	2x04	"Lucky Day"
05-10	2x05	"The Story & the Engine"
05-17	2x06	"The Interstellar Song Contest"
05-24	2x07	"Wish World"
05-31	2x08	"The Reality War"

Episode Discussion Archive

Doctor Who Wiki

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Doctor Who boss on why he carried on Chris Chibnall arc (www.radiotimes.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It's Day 1 of this new community, so why not throw a grenade into it by bringing up the Timeless Child story?

Personally, I don't have a big issue with the concept of the Timeless Child. I think the possibility of earlier, uknown versions of the Doctor, some of whom could even be antagonists, is pretty exciting.

I understand the frustration expressed by those who don't like that the Doctor is basically the foundation of modern Time Lord society by being the origin of regeneration. I don't really have a rebuttal to that.

I do think that the story in the Chibnall era was poorly told, and it failed to do anything interesting with the concepts it presented. So far, I like the way Davies is embracing the story, even if it's just to add some texture to the Doctor's backstory, and the way he interacts with the universe.

One thing Davies hasn't done so far is address the fact that this is not just an adoption story, which is the way he's portrayed it so far - it's also an abuse story. I think he's going to have to reckon with that at some point.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Generally Doctor Who gets into a quagmire when it starts mining the backstory for story ideas. Too much of it and the show becomes unwatchable. Chibnall didn't appear to have many plans for it beyond introducing Jo Martin's Doctor so it's hard to understand why it was brought up in the first place.

That said RTD seems to have found an interesting take on it with the orphan angle and seems to have used it as a soft continuity reset of the backstory. With the new "happy go lucky" Doctor that we have in the 15th and the fact that we are back to being the "last of the time lords" (at least for the moment) I think it's going to hard to explore the abuse angle in any depth without bringing the angst back.