this post was submitted on 12 May 2024
1282 points (97.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

9826 readers
56 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children)

The funny part will be once the car doesn't have a driver and is full autonomous. If the car kills someone, who's to blame?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You treat it like any other traffic accident, except if a self driving car is responsible, that responsibility lies with the vehicle's owner.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It would have to be the manufacturer.

If someone steals your car and kills someone with it, then disappears without ever being identified, the car owner doesn't assume liability. Liability falls on whoever was operating it at the time. If software was driving, then the software company assumes the liability.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Doubt it. I mean, any self driving car is going to make the driver agree to responsibility for what the car does and ensure the user has a manual override available just in case.

No company is going to ship fully autonomous driving software (for example to have fully autonomous driverless taxis) without contractually making the fleet owner responsible for their fleet cars.

[–] explodicle 1 points 6 months ago

But you bought the driverless car and turned it on. You never agreed to the thief's joyride. Where do you draw the line for "operation" - like operating a steering-assist car, or operating a Roomba?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The company that rented it to you, because fully self-driving cars won't be for private ownership, they'll just replace rideshare drivers.

[–] explodicle 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Who's to say that will be immediate? Many people won't be quick to abandon their guaranteed-available vehicle, especially while every house and employer has parking.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] explodicle 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Not rhetorical question: has insurance ever immediately eliminated anything?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If it ends up being too expensive, yes.

[–] explodicle 1 points 6 months ago

Like what? Seriously asking.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

What is your definition of immediate to begin with, 1year to 10years?

[–] explodicle 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Whichever definition just said so

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ok so ten years then. In that time nearly all average family cars will be smart. They will have self-driving (they can come pick you up). Will have a few years of insurance claims and premiums showing they are not responsible for 99% of crashes and insurance will react accordingly pushing up the insurance of the last holdouts so far that it becomes uneconomical for the average person to drive "manual".

[–] explodicle 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It sounds like we're assuming a similar adoption curve and are just using terms differently. In those intermediate years while insurance is reacting, if the driverless car kills someone, who's to blame?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Driverless car company. What that means in legal terms is beyond my understanding but companies kill people everyday so there's probably precident.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

The person for getting in the way, obviously

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Replace car with dog or animal

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's not the same. When you have a dog you use a leash and, if needed, you can restrain the mouth.

In this case you are not in control. And you can't be. You are just a passenger. And you should have the same responsibility as a passenger in a train: none.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I didn't know about your parameters. I would think your example pushes it home, no car should ever be fully autonomous and should have a "leash" that a human could "restrain" the car with if necessary. Is no good?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't know if I'll see it but in the future cars will be fully autonomous. And once every car can be autonomous human drivers will be banned.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Did our prophet tell you this? What about alien drivers?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Only what I think it will be the "normal" progression.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Oh ok, what other prophecies can you foretell wise One?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Whichever was at fault is my non-lawyer opinion.

What kind of penalty you apply to a self driving car guilty for causing an accident is a good question though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

I guess it would be the car maker's responsibility if you are only a passenger in the car.