this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
295 points (99.3% liked)

Not The Onion

11812 readers
586 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

That's also a legal issue with autonomous cars.

Autonomous cars can also get into basically the trolley problem. If an accident is unavoidable, but the car can swerve and kill its own passenger to avoid killing more people in a larger wreck, should it? And would that end up as more liability for whoever takes the blame?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The owner or lesse of the car is responsible. Think of the car as a dog that bit a child.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Are we talking truly autonomous vehicles with no driver, or today's "self-driving-but-keep-your-hands-on-the-wheel" type cars?

In the case of the former, it should be absolutely the fault of the manufacturer.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You could definitely put some blame on the manufacturer, but in legalize you "knew or should have known" that there was a possiblity that your vehicle could hurt or kill someone. You sent it out into the world without a driver in it, not the manufacturer. I wouldn't be surprised to see warnings and agreements attached to autonomous vehicles telling people that there is risk.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Say there is a car with no human driver, that is being sold as requiring "no human input other than set destination, stop, and go".

If that vehicle crashes, you think the person who bought the car (the passenger) has legal liability, and not the manufacturer?

That's like being a passenger on a bus and getting sued if the bus driver hits a parked car.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

The bus company gets sued because they own the bus, not the driver. Same as if you lend your car to someone, you're at least partially responsible.