Technology

59669 readers

2830 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

375

House approves sell-or-be-banned TikTok measure, attaching it to foreign aid bill (www.npr.org)

submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

171 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] zalgotext 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah it's a good question, and I think the answer should be: it shouldn't. Instead of cracking down on one platform or another, they should be cracking down on the bad behaviors built into those platforms.

But alas, that would require us to elect politicians that understand an ounce of nuance

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

I agree with you, but I'm assuming malice because I don't think that stupidity adequately explains their behavior. I think that, to them, the problem isn't propaganda and espionage, it's Chinese propaganda and Chinese espionage where American propaganda and American espionage should be. That's why they're not making what tiktok does illegal, and that's why they're trying to force a sale rather than actually banning it.