this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
915 points (96.1% liked)

Science Memes

9978 readers
1333 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

Sister Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
915
Or we could do metric time (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
198 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mnemonicmonkeys 35 points 4 months ago (5 children)

This reminds me of a fantasy series I like, where the world still has 365 day, but every month is 30 days long, and the remaining 5 days are separate holidays for the solstices, equinoxes, and new years.

Also, when are we going to do 10hrs/day, 100 min/hr and 100s/min?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Don't decimalize time, instead dozenalize our numbers! Twelve is such a better building block than ten. Pretty much all math becomes way easier using dozenal numbers instead of decimal ones.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

With base 12 you can actually get a result for 1/3

[–] mnemonicmonkeys 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

But not for 1/5

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

Big Decimal has brainwashed the population into thinking that 5 is a good number instead of the terrible prime number that it is. It should be clumped in with 7 and 11 as Bad Numbers when you're dealing with anything except for 10s.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago

Yes, but having 2, 3, 4, 6 as factors is way better than having only 2 and 5. We’d be giving up one factor to add three.

[–] zalgotext 13 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Also, when are we going to do 10hrs/day, 100 min/hr and 100s/min?

This is how you collectively give the entire scientific community a simultaneous aneurysm. The amount of work needed to convert measurements based on our current seconds/minutes/hours to your "metric" seconds/minutes/hours would be astronomical.

Also, pretty much everyone already agrees on the current system of time, so why change it? It would just create another metric/imperial or F/C divide and cause conversion mistakes.

[–] SapphironZA 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think we are due another Y2K legacy system replacement global project.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

It would add another level to time conversion between timezones

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Oh god, converting imperial kHz to metric kHz sounds awful

[–] mnemonicmonkeys 1 points 4 months ago

Mwahahaha!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

The 24h cycle with subdivisions in 60 is easy for dividing them up though. 60 divides by 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20 and 30.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I like this better because if you have to do one holiday outside of the calendar then why not 5 and the equinoxes and solsctices divide it up perfectly. Then everything else is nice and even. I assume weeks were six days long as that is how I always thought of it. 5 six day weeks.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys 1 points 4 months ago

Apparently in the series it's 6 5-day weeks. They also didn't have names for the days