this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
124 points (94.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43760 readers
1543 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/19371857

I'm curious to learn about places around the globe that have a significant amount of underutilized tourism infrastructure. In many cases, I suspect that governments are propping up unsustainable tourism operators or investing in tourism with a "build it and they will come" mentality.

Here are a few examples that I'm aware of:

  • Qatar - The country has an oversupply of hotels relative to the number of visitors, and its tourism economy heavily relies on layover tours due to the strength of Qatar Airways' network.

  • Saudi Arabia - In an effort to diversify its economy away from oil, the country is pushing a massive tourism development agenda, despite having many factors that make it less appealing to visitors. Religious tourism seems to be a primary focus.

  • North Korea - For obvious reasons... For example, only a few floors of the Ryugyong Hotel are ever occupied.

  • Northern Japan (Aomori, Akita, Sendai) - These places are heavily fueled by domestic tourism, and are basically deserted for half of the year (despite attractions and so on still functioning).

To clarify, I'm not looking for hidden gems or places that are simply underrated travel destinations. Instead, I'm interested in learning about locations where there is a clear mismatch between the available tourism infrastructure and the actual number of visitors.

I want to find places where I might end up being the only visitor to a museum or one of few tourists on an airport bus. The fact that these museums and airport limo buses even exist is where the question stems from.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

I'd definitely like to go there someday too--it's just a bit too remote for me at the moment.

I can see its tourism becoming what Iceland was like 15-20 years ago.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I'm in South Greenland atm and it's just amazing! No tourists, no tours, no souvenirs just incredible nature and huge mountains. I've not been to Iceland yet, but the nature here is just so amped up it's insane. Bonus icebergs floating around all year!

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Those are the exact things I'm looking for (just waiting for a few more roads to connect towns). I'm glad to hear it's living up to the expectations I've heard of!

I went to Iceland a couple years ago and the landscapes are amazing, but there are definitely areas where you run into a lot of tourists, busses, etc.

I'm visiting the Faroe Islands later this year and I'm hoping to experience some rugged landscapes in relative isolation there too.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There will never be roads to connect towns, there's too many mountains. Best take a boat or a helicopter ๐Ÿš. Definitely have Faroe on my bucket list too.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

I would have thought so too, but they're working on at least one. Although you're right about a lot of places being unfeasible--anything more than dirt/gravel in a very limited number of communities would be cost prohibitive.