this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
451 points (95.0% liked)

The Onion

4584 readers
735 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

If I'm an idiot, then why don't you show me an example of wanting a non-political game for non-racist reasons?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Many people play games to escape reality. I dont feel like having current political bullshit in my games as i'm confronted with that day to day. Let me just fly around in spaceships or race cars or whatever.

I'll play games with politics when I'm up for it.

I don't understand this whole thing, is this something American?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Okay but everything is politics, its only a matter of how controversial those politics are ('monarchy bad' and 'Nazis evil' used to be pretty safe, but are edgelord shit now) and for some of us our fucking existence is controversial enough that basically anything is either 'political' or a direct assault.

Like, if I want a 'non political' escape from reality, that's by your definition to a world where I don't exist. Where nobody like me exists. Where nobody like me can exist. That's cool. Worlds where I'm not allowed to exist are totally apolitical; nothing to read into there.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There's a certain portion of the chronically online population that has taken the "us versus them" mentality to a whole new level. By their estimation their political beliefs are morally right and they therefore have a moral obligation to spread those beliefs at every opportunity.

This has two major effects. The first is that because their viewpoints are morally correct, everyone who does not agree with every aspect of their political beliefs is not only wrong, but evil. Ambivalence, skepticism, and doubt are similarly evil.

The second is that because their viewpoints are morally correct every piece of media, great and small, must advocate for their ideology. To simply make no ideological or political statements is a wasted opportunity, and is therefore sinful.

While these zealots make up a tiny, tiny fraction of the population they spend a lot of their time validating and shoring up their beliefs. This has the unfortunate side effect of making the internet shittier for the rest of us who just want to hang out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Okay but what if I'm hearing people around me actively talk about exterminating me and rounding people like me up into camps?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There's a pretty clear line between calling out extremism and making partisan politics a lifestyle.

You knew that, which is why you chose that example.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If the line's that clear, show me where it is.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sure, at the taking of life or reduction of freedom based on immutable aspects of personhood determined at birth and/or without due process.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

So I agree on the first part.

Explain what the fuck "due process" means to you? Because to me it sounds kinda sick. (Edit: Sick as in perverse, vile, abominable)

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Buddy, at some point you're going to need to get yourself a basic understanding of civics.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I think I have a pretty advanced understanding and find what I assume to be your understanding offensive as fuck, for reasons I'm willing to lay out here, but I could be wrong about what you mean when you say that, and I don't want to talk shit on an imaginary dumbass at you. If that makes any sense.

So I asked for clarification.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Politics doesn't have anything to do with the amount of effort it takes to play a game. You're confusing two vastly different concepts. Ultimately what you are saying is that you want a game devoid of meaning, which you feel no obligation to understand or judge. That's not politics, but it is interesting, because I have typically only heard the assertion that art should not have meaning from gamers and nazis.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Mate, what's wrong about enjoying a puzzle game for instance? Games don't necessarily need a meaning if the mechanics are fun. Art can have meaning, without being political. As long as something invokes emotions, it has meaning. I just don't like how you said, that one is inherently racist when they don't want politics in games.

I do enjoy games with fictional or even historical politics by the way, but sometimes it's just nice to simply play a sports game. Real world politics are so heated at the moment, I really can't deal with anything too close to reality. Nazis are on the rise again and it's just so depressing. Some people are simply exhausted. Not fucking racists.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Oh, you don't like the real world? That's a political ideology, it's called soulism. Look it up, it might appeal to you, since it sounds like you're already a soulist.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Be that as it may, it's possible for entertainment to be void of politics. You're coming up with philosophies, not politics.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

No it's not. Games are either realist or irrealist. Both are political. I've never seen a game that was neither.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Because I just want a simple game of solitaire while I take a shit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But solitaire comments on the politics of unfairness in life and arbitrary rule systems.....

.....I tried.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Why does the king have higher value than the queen?

And why do they, half the time, have higher value than the ace?

And the strictly hierarchal segregated nature of all of it is... Less than appealing

(You're welcome)