this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
74 points (91.1% liked)

Linux

47308 readers
548 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I told myself I wasn't gonna do it anytime soon but I distro hopped from Endeavour OS to Arch with Hyprland in the span of 3 days. Nothing against endeavour. I just tried to customize, broke some stuff and decided to try Hyprland again. I'm quite liking it. It takes awhile to get used to it but it's fun. I cloned a repo for a customized version of it. I don't know how long I'll stick with it but wish me luck!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Good luck then. I spent happy years on Arch but recently hopped to Void because lately Arch packages broke to much (mainly because of my choices to be honest) and I wanted something different (not specifically no systemd)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah Void is fantastic. I just switched back and I doubt I’ll be moving to anything else.

I only switched away in the first place because I had gotten so comfortable I wanted to try something new (Guix, also amazing!).

But there’s something so comfy about Void once you grok it, just lots of little good decisions which add up to a great experience.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

@mrh @Qpernicus it also has a very cool name i switched to it because of that, also do the android dream of ele

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What Arch based distoe were you on? I would love to spend some time on Debian and OpenSUSE eventually. Also Fedora is intriguing, I wished I tried it already.

I've had experience with Debian based and Arch based distros only. I was on Majaro for months before I had to switch back to windows and leave Linux behind for awhile

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think when he said arch he meant arch and not arch based?!?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Depends on the distro, something like EOS is basically Arch with fancy pants on.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I spent happy years on Arch

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But I was told by the fanboys that Arch never breaks. Could they have lied to me?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No. And arch never broke on me. But some packages did and lately they were just more of those. Admittedly a few were the -git version. And I just wanted something else

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But some packages did

So Arch broke for you.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The OS was perfectly usable, it were just some applications that changed dependency and such. So no I don’t agree that arch broke on me. That doesn’t mean Arch is perfect.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

When a package is not working well, the distribution is said to be broken, at least for that package. This is the Debian definition.

The arch definition is "it's not arch's fault lmao"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I like the aggression on "fanboying Arch," while there's you cherry picking stuff when they're literally mentioning git packages.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He said "some of them", meaning not all packages that broke were -git.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I know, but did you ever ask what those packages are? Are they dependencies? Are the packages that broke came from Arch User Repository? Somehow, you immediately ruled out PEBKAC? I don't know, you're a Linux user, this stuff is pretty basic no? I don't get the anti-fanboyism.