Ask Lemmy

25999 readers

2006 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Rules: (interactive)

1) Be nice and; have fun

Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them

2) All posts must end with a '?'

This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?

3) No spam

Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.

4) NSFW is okay, within reason

Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].

5) This is not a support community.

It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.

Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

candyman337

[email protected]

Is it more respectful to use more current photos of people who have died? Or is it better to use photos from their "prime"? (lemm.ee)

submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Just had this thought and I'm caught between the two. Assuming anything being considered were all "good" photos, what would you prefer if it were you?

*Lots of great responses! I do want to clarify that I am not currently dealing with this scenario myself, but I appreciate the thoughtful comments. Hopefully they can help people that are struggling. I know I'll keep them in mind for the future.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

just noting that people have started putting QR codes on tombstones that direct to a collection/directory of multimedia photos videos audio, notes etc. i think its a great use.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

A tombstone should last for centuries, but a QR code depends on a URL that might not last 5 years.

Either the QR code should be on a swappable card, or needs to point at a domain controlled by the family like RememberingJoeSmith.com

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

How long do you think Joe Smith's family is going to maintain that site, given that it costs real money?

Related: How long after death until people stop visiting the grave?

(Yes, there's a joke about the dead visiting graves, but I chose to ignore it)