this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
184 points (97.4% liked)

Linux

46775 readers
2113 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 122 points 4 months ago (5 children)

it doesn’t even host it’s own repos

Yes, and that's a good thing, otherwise it would be like Manjaro.

EndeavourOS is perfect if you already know your way around a Linux system but don't want to spend the time and effort to setup Arch.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Technically, Endeavour does have its own repos but they only contain a relatively small number of non-essential packages. But yeah, other than that it's basically pre-configured Arch with great defaults.

[–] Jyek 10 points 4 months ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They've been pretty tame lately, but there have been issues historically that made a lot of people (rightfully) mad. You ca read on them here: https://manjarno.pages.dev/

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] girsaysdoom 1 points 4 months ago

It sounds like they made their own bed with preferential treatment towards Manjaro.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago

As someone who loved Manjaro and installed it everywhere, the whole thing is (was?) amateur hour run by clowns. Drama, bugs, but lots of opportunity to contribute if you were equally blind.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They made errors with certificates twice. Apparently, that a cardinal sin for some Linux users.

But if you like Manjaro, use it. It's not perfect, but it's a great distro.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

And DDOSd the AUR.

Twice.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And then worked with Arch to fix the issue with AUR, which made AUR better for everybody.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The official discussion.

You can see there how devs for multiple distros and AUR helpers worked together in a civil manner to solve the issue. It was nice, people cooperated, a textbook example of what FOSS and Linux community spirit is all about.

Yet other people, years later, who aren't distro devs or AUR admins or were even impacted in any way, use that same moment as a reason to hate blindly. It's sad and disgusting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I mean, painting the Manjaro devs breaking the AUR for everyone (twice) as a wholesome, community bonding experience is a bit of a stretch.

The Manjaro devs have a solid track record of being sloppy. That's just a fact. It's fair for people to dislike that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Do tell. I mean Debian has a local root exploit right now but everybody loves Debian. Meanwhile Manjaro is the devil for a DDoS that wasn't even proven as coming from Manjaro machines. Anybody can fake a user agent.

Thing is, pamac on Manjaro could not have DDoS'ed the AUR since it caches all queries. What's the scenario, 125k new Manjaro machines all came online at the same time?

All evidence points at someone scraping the AUR and using the pamac UA as a fake-out. But still the Manjaro devs took the opportunity to improve pamac even so, they asked for more optimized endpoints to use, extended the delay before searching to 1s etc. Which yes I find wholesome under the circumstances.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure you're familiar with Manjarno. I'll refer you to the work that's already been done there.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yes I'm familiar. It's that list of nonsense that people link to when they run out of arguments but just gotta keep hating, right?

Someone should put together a Manjaryes and then we can just swap links and never use any braincells.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Oh no, its actually the list of sourced information about all of Manjaro's fumbles.

It's open-source, you're welcome to open an issue if you can dispute the claims in it.

Or you can just keep calling it nonsense. Whatever's easier.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You don’t know archinstall?? It’s on the normal ArchISO

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (4 children)

That's still CLI based, while Calamares is graphical, no?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I found archinstall to be very simple to follow, even though the whole thing is shown through the CLI, its basically just one page where you setup everything like partitions, boot, etc. Was a lot easier than I expected with the way everyone talks about it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

My only difficulty with it was that I have too many disks and partitions and I didn't want to yeet the wrong one by mistake

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Isn't it TUI? That's almost GUI in my opinion.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yea, it is a very simple CLI based TUI. And I prefer this over GUI in this case, to be honest.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Archinstall is TUI, it's barely any more complicated than Calamares and gives pretty sane defaults and even the option to install DEs.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but do we call it archinstallOS, after installation?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don't get your point. Should we call EndevourOS Arch as well by your logic?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Yes 🌚 but don’t take me serious 😂

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Im not saying that it should, but not doing it literally reduces the distro to little more than an install script for Arch. Just use Arch with the archinstall script or the 10 minute manual install.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

For the record, there's nothing wrong with Manjaro either, it doesn't deserve the Internet hate it often gets and I'm happy to use it as my daily driver.