this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2024
170 points (97.2% liked)
Asklemmy
44149 readers
1447 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
We already have infinite money glitch. Fiat currency just prints more whenever it suits the gov
Also high frequency trading generating money from dips/spikes in stocks' values that are too short lived to affect anything on a human scale. And banks lending money (and thus generating interests from it) they don't actually have yet but I think it's related to the fiat currency thing ?
I guarantee algorithmic traders don't make that much, relative to the amount they start with. If you want to code your own and find out, there's probably someone with an easy-to-sign-up-for API.
Sure, it's probably only worth it for huge banks that hook almost directly into transcontinental internet cables (to which my anti capitalist ass would say, that's probably why it's legal), but to me, that still basically generating some profits by exploiting a "glitch" in the implementation of stock trades while bringing absolutely no real value to the system.
So does that mean you think human-speed trades are different? Usually people that lead with anti-capitalist think it's all witchcraft.
Yes, stocks were made to finance human businesses and be traded between humans to exchange "parts" of a company easily. I'm not fond of capitalism but I can't deny that the stock market provides value under this system. But I don't see where high frequency trading actually brings any of the value it "generates" into this.
My main issues with our current brand of capitalism is that money can be very far removed from reality, with things like greenhouse gasses emissions being effectively "free" even though they affect everyone on the planet, including our economic systems. So, the way I see it, it heavily incentivizes short term profits at the cost of basically everything else. Unless we regulate the hell out of it I guess, but apparently that is a sin against the free market
Interesting. Good on you for actually looking in to how economics is supposed to work. Maybe you'd be interested in this, if you haven't heard about it already?
On climate change, in Canada, we have a carbon tax, but it's still lower than the actual social price of emissions. And the current frontrunner for next election has made scrapping it his whole platform, sadly. I don't know much about high-frequency trading, but I've kind of just assumed it's the same but faster. There are startups, I know that, so it's not a total monopoly. There was one that was using shortwave to pass along information with tiny latency.
Yeah, but it blows up if they don't print just the right amount relative to taxation, so is it really a free lunch?