Technology

59675 readers

3549 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

869

Elon Musk's X pushed a fake headline about Iran attacking Israel. X's AI chatbot Grok made it up. (mashable.com)

submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

93 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A shocking story was promoted on the "front page" or main feed of Elon Musk's X on Thursday:

"Iran Strikes Tel Aviv with Heavy Missiles," read the headline.

This would certainly be a worrying world news development. Earlier that week, Israel had conducted an airstrike on Iran's embassy in Syria, killing two generals as well as other officers. Retaliation from Iran seemed like a plausible occurrence.

But, there was one major problem: Iran did not attack Israel. The headline was fake.

Even more concerning, the fake headline was apparently generated by X's own official AI chatbot, Grok, and then promoted by X's trending news product, Explore, on the very first day of an updated version of the feature.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 181 points 7 months ago (2 children)

People who deploy AI should be held responsible for the slander and defamation the AI causes.

[–] [email protected] 100 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Slander is spoken. In print, it's libel.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Slander is spoken. In print, it’s libel.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Get me pictures of Spiderman!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago

Parker, why does Spider-Man have seven fingers in this photo?!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago

Why I imagine Xitter lawyers arguing that was it was neither spoken nor "printed", they can't be charged?

[+] [email protected] -29 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You expect people pushing AI fear mongering to be literate?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 7 months ago (1 children)

how is it fear mongering when shit like this is happening? AI as it stands is unregulated and will continue to cause issues if left this way

[+] [email protected] -9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So will self-driving cars, the oil industry, and a bunch of others. The US is a plutocracy, and Musk has enough power to keep playing around with this, so that's it. If you want actual change, either start organizing for a general strike or a civil war, since stopping Musk is not on the ballot, and most likely won't be for either of your lifetimes.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I mean, if your problem is just narrowly musk, the one guy, you don't need a whole war; just one shot.

I'm not advocating this, just pointing out, you know? Not that I have a problem with turning the class massacre into a class war.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The thing is, the vast majority of terrorist attacks and assassinations are organized by rich people using poor people as pawns to further their political agenda. Such things are rarely born from people who are in touch with society and are compassionate with others.

9/11 was organized by rich people to get back at other rich people for attacking their business. Even today's right wing crazies only exist because there is a propaganda machine running on obscene wealth whipping desperate people into a frenzy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I don't see what terrorism has to do with this. Unless you mean the practical definition of 'things that upset the wealthy'. Which is dumb. I want a special scary word for things that upset me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Well if you read OpenAI's terms of service, there's an indemnification clause in there.

Basically if you get ChatGPT to say something defaming/libellous and then post it, you would foot the legal bill for any lawsuits that may arise from your screenshot of what their LLM produced.