Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
view the rest of the comments
Are you implying that only speech that results in someone being thrown in jail should be defended or something?
I don't get how that question makes a lick o' sense, especially since free speech absolutists defend harmful, hateful rhetoric that also doesn't get anyone thrown in jail, just pisses a lot of people off. It's not like people go to jail for misgendering trans people or participating in an insurrection.
Then I don’t understand your point. If nobody is punished for their speech then they have free speech.
That's a great point! Riddle me this: What are supposed free speech absolutists defending then??
I don’t think I’ve ever talked about them.
Alrighty, then. Fair enough.
The question was defending their right to express the opinion, not government persecution. Also, good job of ignoring 90% of the original comment.