this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
203 points (95.1% liked)

Gaming

21632 readers
5 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's PR. Anti-capitalist sentiments score well in focus groups.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wouldn't these sentiments lead to expectations and then actual changes in policies?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

As long as the policy changes lead to even more profits, then sure.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

lol the difference of course being that Phil Spencer is not living on the income of a standup comedian.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If nothing else, it keeps an anticapitalist narrative in the public discourse

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

A controlled anticapitalist discourse. This is no different than that Pepsi ad with the "protesters" sharing a Pepsi with the police.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Time will tell. I mean, he's not wrong. I think it's pretty clear that studios have to make profitable games at the cost of interesting games. But it's not like msft or anyone else is going to change their behavior. They have a fiduciary duty to their shareholders to profit as much as possible.