this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
66 points (97.1% liked)
Chevron 7
1332 readers
1 users here now
Chevron 7
A community for sharing humor about Stargate in all its iterations.
Rules:
- Follow the Lemmy.World Terms of Service. This includes (but is not limited to):
- Lemmy.World is not a place for you to attack other people or groups of people.
- Always be respectful of the privacy of others who access and use the website.
- Links to copyright infringing content are not allowed
- Stay on topic. Posts must be directly related to Stargate, be it a meme, joke, screenshot, discussion prompt, etc.
- Be good, don't be bad. You're an adult, or close enough, I trust you know how to act around people.
For more general Stargate content, visit [email protected]
founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
And the original movie that spawned all the shows we're talking about could be poorly described as a spacey twist on dances with wolves.
As I said, lack of direction that was present in the previous shows.
Of course the biggest difference is they had experience enough to try and do new things for the series, but didn't apply their experience from the past shows in the "clear direction" aspect. I feel like once you've got two shows of the same header under your belt, you should be able to hit the ground running coughstartrekcough
I'm absolutely open to a variation of the set formula. A third, almost identical show would've been boring as hell. Yet, I did not enjoy “Lost” at all and “Universe” failed to grab me for the same reasons ;)