this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
1199 points (98.9% liked)

memes

9616 readers
3794 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
1199
Mafs (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 5 months ago by sjmarf to c/[email protected]
58 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

By tweaking a few parameters you can turn every base into any other base for exponentials. Just use e^(ln(b)*x)

PS: The formula here would be e^(ln(2)/3*X) and x is the number of months. So the behavior it's exponential in nature.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

By that definition you can turn any linear function a * x + b, "exponential" by making it e^ln(a*x +b) even though it's actually linear (you can do it to anything, including sin() or even ln() itself, which would make per that definition the inverse of exponential "exponential").

Essentially you're just doing f(f^-1^(g(x))) and then saying "f(m) is e^m^ so if I make m = ln(g(x)) then g(x) is exponential"

Also the correct formula in your example would be e^(ln(2)*X/3) since the original formula if X denotes months is 2^X/3^

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't matter if you divide ln(2) or x by three, it's the same thing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Get a room you two