Green - An environmentalist community

5354 readers

2 users here now

This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!

RULES:

1- Remember the human

2- Link posts should come from a reputable source

3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith

Related communities:

Unofficial Chat rooms:

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

343

Amazon says its plastic packaging can be recycled. An investigation finds it usually isn't. | Grist (grist.org)

submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

43 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Random.

I can get 8 items at one time... Two will be in a box, four will be in paper bags, and two will be in plastic bags.

For such an automated company, you'd think that everything would just be in a single box.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Your order(s) don't necessarily ship all of the items from the same warehouse.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

But each item from a different warehouse?

I used to get everything in single boxes before. Now it's always multiple packages.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This is speculation, but it's probably a lot faster and cheaper to just pack and ship instead of collecting first, and then packing and shipping.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

I can't see it being cheaper, since those packages aren't free. Faster? Not sure about that, either. Amazon automates a lot of their process, and the separate items would still need to gather in one place to be shipped together anyway. Packing a half dozen separate items is surely less efficient than packing everything in one box.

Again, this wasn't a problem a few years ago, when everything would come in a single box. The greenwashing by Amazon about their plastic bags is 10 steps backwards, IMO.