Games

16698 readers

520 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO

139

Starfield's lead quest designer had 'absolutely no time' and had to hit the 'panic button' so the game would have a satisfying final quest (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 7 months ago by nanoUFO to c/games

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 121 points 7 months ago (1 children)

500 people and 9 years and they ran out of time.

[–] [email protected] 72 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I have zero hope for Elder Scrolls 6 now. How in the world can you not plan out a game given all those resources? And it was a blank slate too, they could have done anything at all with Starfield.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Every Bethesda game since Skyrim (and arguably Skyrim, depending on who you talk to) has followed the exact same script: exponentially longer development time to shart out marginal graphics improvements, dumbed-down mechanics and vastly less engaging storytelling.

Up until Starfield I had managed to enjoy all of them for what they were (with modders' help of course). But Starfield is so aggressively dull I had a free 30-day trial of Microsoft GPU and could only manage maybe a week of playing it on the cloud before I was literally too bored to bother.

Given Bethesda's trajectory, I have to agree with you. ES6 is going to be pure shit.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Don't forget, Starfield was Todd's dream game.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yeah, he must have been dreaming it was a good game

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, a blank slate can also result in collective choice paralysis.

If it had been clear from the start that they're just doing another Fallout, then they could have gotten started on a main quest surrounding a nuclear freak accident with post-apolyptic hardships and maybe a reunification side arc.

With Starfield, they first had to decide what problems might exist in this blank slate, before they could start telling about it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's too bad they didn't have nine years to think of something.

If you have 9 years to make a game and can't figure out how to make it fun until the last year (bethsoft devs have said this happened) what are you even doing making games?

I would love to have a job where I could spend a decade saying "I don't know what to do" and still get paid.