this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2024
217 points (92.2% liked)

Space

8790 readers
6 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula

Related Communities

๐Ÿ”ญ Science

๐Ÿš€ Engineering

๐ŸŒŒ Art and Photography

Other Cool Links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
217
New research suggests that our universe has no dark matter (phys.org)
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
73 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] -4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

These type of comments always throw me through a loop.

Scientist:

Makes hypothesis, does analysis, writes paper, and presents work for other academics to review.

Lemmy poster:

Logs into lemmy. Posts "i think not mr scientist". Recieves upvotes.

While I would certainly like to say I understood any of this. This post has not met any rigorous standard of debunking the researchers findings.

It's fine if you have knowledge on this particular subject but it kinda seems like you're just throwing shade.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I get what you're saying, but peer review isn't exactly all that rigorous either

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

They meet the bare minimum of at least being a peer in their field of research.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

While I would certainly like to say I understood any of this. This post has not met any rigorous standard of debunking the researchers findings.

Thats not what the posting claimed to be. You missunderstand. Either intentionally or just as a fact.