1
58
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
2
32
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
3
45
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
4
26
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
  • Satellite images renew fear over growing Chinese military presence in Cuba

  • CSIS: Images pinpoint four Chinese military sites across Cuba

  • Cuban official: Island isn't harboring Chinese military interests

5
32
submitted 5 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
6
29
submitted 6 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
7
3
submitted 5 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
8
-5
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
9
0
submitted 6 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
10
31
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
11
32
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
12
15
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
13
33
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
14
8
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/17029482

In an open letter to publishers, more than 30,000 readers, researchers, and authors begged for access to the books to be restored in the open library, claiming the takedowns dealt "a serious blow to lower-income families, people with disabilities, rural communities, and LGBTQ+ people, among many others," who may not have access to a local library or feel "safe accessing the information they need in public."

During a press briefing following arguments in court Friday, IA founder Brewster Kahle said that "those voices weren't being heard." Judges appeared primarily focused on understanding how IA's digital lending potentially hurts publishers' profits in the ebook licensing market, rather than on how publishers' costly ebook licensing potentially harms readers.

15
77
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
16
3
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
17
120
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
18
70
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
19
13
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
20
6
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
21
19
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
22
37
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
23
19
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
24
7
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
25
28
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/16899680

In the wake of Texas’ abortion ban, the state’s infant death rate increased and more died of birth defects, a study published Monday shows.

The analysis out of Johns Hopkins University is the latest research to find higher infant mortality rates in states with abortion restrictions.

The researchers looked at how many infants died before their first birthday after Texas adopted its abortion ban in September 2021. They compared infant deaths in Texas to those in 28 states — some also with restrictions. The researchers calculated that there were 216 more deaths in Texas than expected between March and December the next year.

In Texas, the 2022 mortality rate for infants went up 8% to 5.75 per 1,000 births, compared to a 2% increase in the rest of the U.S., according to the study in the journal JAMA Pediatrics.

view more: next ›

US News

108 readers
83 users here now

US news only.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS