libertarianism

393 readers
1 users here now

About us

An open, user owned community for the general disscussion of the libertarian philosophy.

Most people live their own lives by that code of ethics. Libertarians believe that that code should be applied consistently, even to the actions of governments, which should be restricted to protecting people from violations of their rights. Governments should not use their powers to censor speech, conscript the young, prohibit voluntary exchanges, steal or “redistribute” property, or interfere in the lives of individuals who are otherwise minding their own business.

Source: https://www.libertarianism.org/essays/what-is-libertarianism

Rules

1. Stay on topicWe are a libertarian community. There are no restrictions regarding different stances on the political spectrum, but all posts should be related to the philosophy of libertarianism.

2. Be polite to others and respects each others opinions.Be polite to others and respects each others opinions. We don't want any form of gatekeeping or circlejerk culture here.

3. Stay constructive and informationalIn general, all types of contributions are allowed, but the relevance to this community must always be evident and presented openly by the contributor. Posts that do not meet these requirements will be removed after a public warning. Also remember to cite you sources!

4. Use self-moderation measures first before reporting.This community is fundamentally built upon freedom of speech. Since everyone understands libertarianism differently and we do not want to exclude any kind of content a priori, we appeal to the individual users to block/mute posts or users who do not meet their requirements. Please bear this in mind when filing a report

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1
 
 

What exactly happened to Libertarianism?

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
 
 

"Inalienable Rights: Part I The Basic Argument" - what Nozick and Rothbard got wrong

https://www.ellerman.org/inalienable-rights-part-i-the-basic-argument/

“An inalienable right is a right that may not be ceded or transferred away even with the consent of the holders of the right. Any contract to alienate such a right would be an inherently invalid contract, and, vice-versa, a right such that any contract to alienate it was inherently invalid would thus be an inalienable right.”

@libertarianism

15
16
17
18
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/17854329

Leftist news commentary and interviews. Fighting for political and social change. Sabby Sabs podcast is a part of Revolutionary Blackout Network.

#freeandequalpresidentialdebate2024 #sabbysabs #jillstein #thirdpartydebate #thomasmassie #greenparty #libertarianparty #robertfkennedyjr #cornelwestnews


Initial Summary

  1. The video segment discusses a third-party presidential debate where some candidates, including Dr. Cornell West and RFK Jr., did not participate.
  2. RFK Jr. mentioned not wanting to debate his friends, implying he sees other independent candidates as friends.
  3. The moderator, Thomas Massie, participated despite his recent personal loss.
  4. The candidates criticized Trump and Biden for not participating, urging them to defend their ideas on a debate stage.
  5. Emphasizing the importance of challenging and defending beliefs openly, the candidates called out the absent candidates for not engaging in debates.
  6. The debate participants highlighted the need for unity and challenging the two-party system.
  7. They criticized mainstream media for controlling the narrative and spreading division.
  8. The candidates emphasized respectful discourse and learning from each other, contrasting it with the hostility seen in major party debates.
  9. The speaker criticizes the distraction of focusing on trivial matters like golf scores instead of addressing real issues affecting the American people.
  10. They call out two Independent candidates, RFK and Cornell West, for not showing up to debates despite advocating for open debates.
  11. Concerns are raised about abortion and racial targeting, referencing Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood.
  12. The video concludes with a call for candidates to attend future debates and engage in serious discussions on important issues.
  13. The speakers discussed ways to address the inflation crisis impacting the cost of living, including fuel, food, and housing.
  14. Dr. Jill Stein emphasized ensuring money injected into the economy leads to growth rather than just driving inflation.
  15. Randall Terry criticized excessive defense spending and highlighted the negative effects of injecting large sums of money into the economy during crises.
  16. He advocated for energy independence and questioned the sustainability of current economic practices.
  17. The speakers discuss a professor from their undergraduate days who would drink before class, leading to a lack of respect from students.
  18. The conversation transitions into a discussion about boosting the economy by reducing government involvement and allowing individuals to make their own decisions.
  19. Advocating for cutting spending, particularly on Social Security and entitlement programs, to prevent future financial crises.
  20. They suggest that allowing states to govern themselves could lead to more tailored laws and regulations based on individual preferences.
19
20
21
22
23
24
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/17502741

[LIVE+49min] Free & Equal Presidential Debate at FreedomFest 2024 [LIVE | JUO 12 24 | The Free and Equal Elections Foundation]

Join us live from 5-7 PM PDT for the Free & Equal Presidential Debate at FreedomFest 2024! Witness a historic and inclusive debate as candidates come together to discuss critical issues facing our nation. We aim to provide a platform for diverse voices and promote electoral reform. Don't miss this opportunity to hear from leaders who challenge the status quo and advocate for a free and fair election process. Please consider donating to support more independent debates like this one at freeandequal.org.

25
view more: next ›