Brexit

downvoters I assume are people who still think brexit was a good idea

By Silvia Marchetti

ROME – A die-hard Brexiter who regularly travels to countries across Europe says his trips have strengthened his belief that the UK was right to leave the European Union.

Simon Newell, a 56-year-old policy and partnership consultant from Brighton, said his holidays have shown him the stark differences that exist within any single country and the need for local governments that are close to the people.

“We can’t have blanket rules,” he told i, adding that he believes the EU has proven unable to cope with different territorial challenges within member states.

Blanket rules for EU countries on issues like migration were “farcical”, he claimed, as Munich faces different challenges compared to Rome or Paris, for instance.

“I voted Leave because I believe the European institutions are not representative of the British people and their needs, they’re too distant, government and policies should be as local as possible,” said Mr Newell, who frequently visits Sicily and other parts of Italy.

“I do think that some countries, France, Germany, have fared fairly well through the EU, and others – Greece, possibly Italy – have fared less well.”

While several expats and Britons with second homes abroad have spoken to i about how Brexit has made their lives more difficult, Mr Newell called for patience.

“I think you need to wait at least a generation, 10 years or so, to see the real impact of Brexit before any big decision regarding another vote is taken,” he said.

He added that the UK’s economic downturn may not be solely due to Covid-19 and poor political decisions, but could also be a side effect of Britain’s previous EU membership. “It is difficult to judge how much of what is going on is due to Brexit or Covid policies,” he said.

While he believes that the EU has generally made a positive contribution as a trading bloc, he says its governance has been “less positive” and contributed to “a sense of distant decision-making, taking democratic function further away from communities”.

Relevant bit:

If you go back to the period after the referendum, there were pretty dire predictions about the consequences of Brexit for the financial services world, for the City of London. And I think so far, those effects have been smaller. Now, that’s not to say that I trivialise them, discount them, and ignore them. Actually, quite the opposite. I’ve said right from the— actually, I remember saying the week after the referendum, you know, “this means we will have to work even harder to make sure we don’t become isolationist.”

But I think it has actually created opportunities. I think we have protected, and in a sense ensured, that much of the market and much of the industry remains here. And that’s been important. It’s been very important.

Barber: So, it’s not a slow puncture?

Bailey: I don’t think it is, no. I don’t think it is. But I think we have to keep working at it very hard. I mean, it’s been a very hard, very large amount of work, but it was necessary. And again, my point is I don’t take a position on Brexit. We had to respond. You know, we had to do what we had to do at that point, and that’s our job.