wurzelgummidge

joined 4 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

“Why is it that we must then single out China as an issue?” Mr Anwar asked.

Because that is what the US wants and it amplifies it's bullshit via its western media industrial complex.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

That child violated the ceasefire by being alive.

Regards

Israel

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago

Provoke a violent backsh, end the ceasefire, blame the Palestinians.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago

Don't take your foot off the gas now, boycott, boycott, boycott.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

You didn't really expect such a snake in the weeds to honour an agreement.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

China’s a nation that seems to believe that they can use their government to make things better.

Isn't that what you pay taxes for?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

But nowhere else on the planet invests as much money and effort into it as the US. $325 million a year on anti China propaganda alone:

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/1157/text

You never saw that mentioned in the media did you? There is a reason for that:

It is one of the most important aspects of our media system, and yet hardly known to the public: most of the international news coverage in Western media is provided by only three global news agencies based in New York, London and Paris.

The key role played by these agencies means Western media often report on the same topics, even using the same wording. In addition, governments, military and intelligence services use these global news agencies as multipliers to spread their messages around the world.

https://swprs.org/the-propaganda-multiplier/

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

"China Unfairly Educates it's Students" - the western media industrial complex probably

[–] [email protected] -5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Wikipedia

Can you site a source more credible than a crowd sourced encyclopedia run by Americans

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's unclear how long Beijing would be open to such unfettered exchanges - control of the internet is key to its repressive regime.

Lol, "unfettered exchanges" have been going on via Chaturbate for some time ... A friend told me

[–] [email protected] -5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

A crowd sourced encyclopedia is only as trustworthy as the editors that control the page. I wouldn't trust wikipedia for anything to do with geopolitics or current affairs any more than I would trust any other mainstream media source.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

上瘾

Shàngyǐn

view more: next ›