wth

joined 2 years ago
[–] wth 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You probably did the right thing for headphones.

I’ve been looking for real data on the effectiveness of Sony’s MX5 vs Max vs others - specifically I want to see how well they do passive and ANC across the frequencies we are exposed to. And Verge have come through with this video: https://www.theverge.com/2023/8/31/23852241/we-took-six-pairs-of-headphones-and-a-dummy-head-on-the-subway

Its a good video, but its also got real data from some experts. If you are TLDW - then skip to the end for a table from the experts.

The Sony MX5 are head and shoulders above the rest (with the max second in most categories).

[–] wth 1 points 1 year ago

I know it was a sorta joke… but I had to find out if it was true.

This link: https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/AirPods+Max+Teardown/139369 provides an awesome breakdown on the contents and lots of X-rays.

It turns out the answer is no, although both batteries are in the right ear cup, and ifixit never do figure if there is a counterweight in the other ear. There’s just a gap.

And yeah… adding that weight was a crappy move and very un-apple IMHO. Their products should stand on their own and not require gimmicks like that. Having said that, this is Beats. Analysis showed that their products cost as little as $18 to make (including parts and assembly) - talk about cheap overpriced crap. The other few hundred dollars per set is marketing, distribution and profit. Shows what celebrity endorsements can get you.

[–] wth 2 points 1 year ago
[–] wth 12 points 1 year ago

Is this the cancel culture that we keep hearing is coming for the MAGA crowd??

[–] wth 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

And heavy. The Max’s are quite a bit heavier than competitors.

[–] wth 3 points 1 year ago

I’m guessing you are not programming on a Mac then :-).

[–] wth 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I’m usually a little suspicious of a new fancy language - because the language is only a part of the equation. Does it have good tooling and does it have awesome libraries?

I had a preconception that Rust is strong as a language (formally well structured, low shoot-yourself-in-the-foot potential, consistent, predictable) and that the tooling seemed strong (debuggers, editors, code completion, help, test frameworks), but I’ve always thought that it would lag with libraries. I mean compared to something like Python (« Batteries included ») or java, surely it is not yet compatible, right?.

So I chose a few of the less main-stream libraries that I use regularly… and Lo and behold! They exist for Rust, including Couchbase, SQLite, ECDH, DiffMatch. I can’t vouch for the completeness of those libs, but the fact that everything I looked for existed… that’s impressive.

[–] wth 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Side note - he kinda was. I grew up in Auckland and as a junior played tennis against his club (but a couple of years after he gave it away). He was, apparently, a very talented junior but decided to focus on running. Good decision as it turns out.

[–] wth 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Nominative Determinism proved wrong!

[–] wth 1 points 1 year ago

Cache clearing has been mentioned as a way to fix issues, but it didn’t work for me. I agree with your comment about the value in having a second IDE though.

[–] wth 2 points 1 year ago

No. I’m on a Mac, and VS is Mac/Windows only. (Well… windows only from next year).

[–] wth 1 points 1 year ago

After I saw your note, I had a quick catchup on that project.

It looks awesome, with the promise of mobile and desktop, and the ability to make apps that can be uploaded to the AppStore. Plus its Dart which is a pretty well structured language. Its ticking a lot of boxes…

Then I ran « wc -l » on my support libraries (i.e. not UI code) - 64k LoC that would need to be rewritten in dart. But then I noticed Flutnet. its probably an abomination linking the two… but it could be promising.

Thanks for the pointer.

view more: ‹ prev next ›