trymeout

joined 1 year ago
 

Upvote the issue on Github if you want to see this feature added into VSCode.

 

I am trying to create a podman compose of NGINX and PHP:FPM. I was able to get NGINX to work on its own using the docker.io./bitnami/nginx image. I gotten close I believe to getting the PHP:FPM to work also but due to an issue with NGINX not cooperating with the PHP:FPM.

In the logs of the NGINX container, I get this error every time I load localhost:8080 in the browser...

10.89.4.2 - - [24/Jul/2024:20:18:35 +0000] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 404 47 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0" "-"
2024/07/24 20:18:35 [error] 44#44: *1 FastCGI sent in stderr: "Primary script unknown" while reading response header from upstream, client: 10.89.4.2, server: localhost, request: "GET / HTTP/1.1", upstream: "fastcgi://10.89.4.3:9000", host: "localhost:8080"

And when I load localhost:8080 in the browser, it displays a blank page which says "File not found.".

I am using podman 5.1.2 on Linux Mint 21.3. My goal is to simply NGINX and PHP to work, to be able to have a web server that can use PHP.

Any advice would be most appreciated.


Directory structure

nginx-php/
   compose.yml
   nginx.conf
   php.dockerfile
   php.ini
   www/
      public/

compose.yml

version: '3'
networks:
    app-tier:
        driver: bridge
services:
    nginx:
        image: docker.io/bitnami/nginx
        volumes:
            - ./nginx.conf:/opt/bitnami/nginx/conf/server_blocks/my_server_block.conf:ro
            - .:/app/
        networks:
            - app-tier
        ports:
            - 8080:8080
    php:
        build:
            context: .
            dockerfile: php.dockerfile
        volumes:
            - .:/app/
        networks:
            - app-tier

nginx.conf

server {
    server_name localhost;
    listen 0.0.0.0:8080;
    
    root /app/www/public;

    index index.php index.html index.htm;
    autoindex on;

    location / {
        try_files $uri $uri/index.php;
    }

    location ~ \.php$ {
        fastcgi_pass php:9000;
        fastcgi_index index.php;
        include fastcgi.conf;
    }
}

php.dockerfile (Will like to get debugging and databases to work later on...)

FROM docker.io/bitnami/php-fpm

# Install xdebug for nicer error messages and debugging
# RUN pecl install xdebug
# RUN docker-php-ext-enable xdebug

# Install mysqli
# RUN docker-php-ext-install mysqli
# RUN docker-php-ext-enable mysqli

# Install PDO
# RUN docker-php-ext-install pdo pdo_mysql

php.ini (Will like to get debugging and databases to work later on...)

[PHP]

extension=mysqli
extension=pdo_mysql


; xdebug settings for debugging
zend_extension=xdebug
xdebug.start_with_request = yes
xdebug.client_host=xdebug://gateway

 

I am trying to create a podman compose of NGINX and PHP:FPM. I was able to get NGINX to work on its own using the docker.io./bitnami/nginx image. I gotten close I believe to getting the PHP:FPM to work also but due to an issue with NGINX not cooperating with the PHP:FPM.

In the logs of the NGINX container, I get this error every time I load localhost:8080 in the browser...

10.89.4.2 - - [24/Jul/2024:20:18:35 +0000] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 404 47 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0" "-"
2024/07/24 20:18:35 [error] 44#44: *1 FastCGI sent in stderr: "Primary script unknown" while reading response header from upstream, client: 10.89.4.2, server: localhost, request: "GET / HTTP/1.1", upstream: "fastcgi://10.89.4.3:9000", host: "localhost:8080"

And when I load localhost:8080 in the browser, it displays a blank page which says "File not found.".

I am using podman 5.1.2 on Linux Mint 21.3. My goal is to simply NGINX and PHP to work, to be able to have a web server that can use PHP.

Any advice would be most appreciated.


Directory structure

nginx-php/
   compose.yml
   nginx.conf
   php.dockerfile
   php.ini
   www/
      public/

compose.yml

version: '3'
networks:
    app-tier:
        driver: bridge
services:
    nginx:
        image: docker.io/bitnami/nginx
        volumes:
            - ./nginx.conf:/opt/bitnami/nginx/conf/server_blocks/my_server_block.conf:ro
            - .:/app/
        networks:
            - app-tier
        ports:
            - 8080:8080
    php:
        build:
            context: .
            dockerfile: php.dockerfile
        volumes:
            - .:/app/
        networks:
            - app-tier

nginx.conf

server {
    server_name localhost;
    listen 0.0.0.0:8080;
    
    root /app/www/public;

    index index.php index.html index.htm;
    autoindex on;

    location / {
        try_files $uri $uri/index.php;
    }

    location ~ \.php$ {
        fastcgi_pass php:9000;
        fastcgi_index index.php;
        include fastcgi.conf;
    }
}

php.dockerfile (Will like to get debugging and databases to work later on...)

FROM docker.io/bitnami/php-fpm

# Install xdebug for nicer error messages and debugging
# RUN pecl install xdebug
# RUN docker-php-ext-enable xdebug

# Install mysqli
# RUN docker-php-ext-install mysqli
# RUN docker-php-ext-enable mysqli

# Install PDO
# RUN docker-php-ext-install pdo pdo_mysql

php.ini (Will like to get debugging and databases to work later on...)

[PHP]

extension=mysqli
extension=pdo_mysql


; xdebug settings for debugging
zend_extension=xdebug
xdebug.start_with_request = yes
xdebug.client_host=xdebug://gateway

 

I was able to setup a debugger using a launch mode using Visual Studio Code with the Bash Debug extension. Is it possible to setup the debugger in VSCode to be able to debug a bash script using a attach debug mode?

For debugging scripts on the host machine and scripts inside a docker container?

 

I was able to setup a debugger using a launch mode using Visual Studio Code with the Bash Debug extension. Is it possible to setup the debugger in VSCode to be able to debug a bash script using a attach debug mode?

For debugging scripts on the host machine and scripts inside a docker container?

 

I was able to setup a debugger using a launch mode using Visual Studio Code with the Bash Debug extension. Is it possible to setup the debugger in VSCode to be able to debug a bash script using a attach debug mode?

For debugging scripts on the host machine and scripts inside a docker container?

 

I was able to setup a debugger using a launch mode using Visual Studio Code with the Bash Debug extension. Is it possible to setup the debugger in VSCode to be able to debug a bash script using a attach debug mode?

For debugging scripts on the host machine and scripts inside a docker container?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

VSCodium > VSCode

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’ll look up my notes tomorrow and post more details.

Thank you. Been struggling to get my IDE setup for go development.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

"console": "integratedTerminal" also works! Thank you?

Do you have a simple setup guide on how to get debugging to work with Go inside a docker container?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

This solution does with when using a launch request in the config. Thank you

Do you have a simple guide by chance on how to get debugging to work inside a docker container using VSCode?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Your files are not encrypted at rest on Nextcloud. Hoodik claims that your files are encrypted at rest.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Nextcloud and Owncloud are not E2EE. Hoodik is E2EE.

Syncthing syncs a folder between 2 or more devices, Hoodik is an E2EE version of Nextcloud

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Syncthing syncs a folder between 2 or more devices, Hoodik is an E2EE version of Nextcloud

 

Just needs a cross platform syncing app

 

When I use the --sourcemap argument in the CLI to generate the CSS builds with sourcemaps, when the CSS uses @include, it does not update the path and therefore will not work.

In the code below, the builds are stored in the dist directory, while the CSS source code is stored in the src directory.

This is my simple code to reproduce this...

- src/
   - stylesheet.css
- dist
   - my-package.css
   - my-package.css.map
- demo.html
- bundle.css
- package.json

bundle.css

@import 'src/stylesheet.css';

demo.html

<link rel="stylesheet" href="dist/my-package.css">

package.json

{
  "name": "my-package",
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "license": "MIT",
  "scripts": {
   "build": "lightningcss --sourcemap bundle.css -o dist/my-package.css"
  },
  "devDependencies": {
    "lightningcss-cli": "^1.25.1"
  }
}

src/stylesheet.css

body {
	background-color: red;
}

dist/my-package.css output

@import "src/stylesheet.css";

/*# sourceMappingURL=dist/my-package.css.map */

What I expected from the dist/my-package.css output

@import "../src/stylesheet.css";

/*# sourceMappingURL=dist/my-package.css.map */

Does anyone know why this is the outcome? Any help will be most appreciated.

 

I made some Go scripts that require user input fmt.Scanln(&fileName) during the execution. When I use the Go debugger built into VSCode which is the launch type, it works but there is no way to enter any prompts when your exeuctable asks for a input. With other programming languages like NodeJS and PHP, there is way to run the scripts in "debugging mode" where it will run the code but before it executes the code, it will wait to attach to a debugger on your system and then execute the code. This has always allowed me to use the terminal for inputs in the executable.

For example to do this in NodeJS, you will use node --inspect-brk=0.0.0.0 main.js instead of node main.js and then run the debugger in VSCode to attach it to the executing script. Is there a way to do this with Go? Do I need to set something up to achieve this?

I am on Linux Mint and cannot find any commands to run go run . but to wait for a debugger to attach to the executable before executing.

 

I made some Go scripts that require user input fmt.Scanln(&fileName) during the execution. When I use the Go debugger built into VSCode which is the launch type, it works but there is no way to enter any prompts when your exeuctable asks for a input. With other programming languages like NodeJS and PHP, there is way to run the scripts in "debugging mode" where it will run the code but before it executes the code, it will wait to attach to a debugger on your system and then execute the code. This has always allowed me to use the terminal for inputs in the executable.

For example to do this in NodeJS, you will use node --inspect-brk=0.0.0.0 main.js instead of node main.js and then run the debugger in VSCode to attach it to the executing script. Is there a way to do this with Go? Do I need to set something up to achieve this?

I am on Linux Mint and cannot find any commands to run go run . but to wait for a debugger to attach to the executable before executing.

 

I made some Go scripts that require user input fmt.Scanln(&fileName) during the execution. When I use the Go debugger built into VSCode which is the launch type, it works but there is no way to enter any prompts when your exeuctable asks for a input. With other programming languages like NodeJS and PHP, there is way to run the scripts in "debugging mode" where it will run the code but before it executes the code, it will wait to attach to a debugger on your system and then execute the code. This has always allowed me to use the terminal for inputs in the executable.

For example to do this in NodeJS, you will use node --inspect-brk=0.0.0.0 main.js instead of node main.js and then run the debugger in VSCode to attach it to the executing script. Is there a way to do this with Go? Do I need to set something up to achieve this?

I am on Linux Mint and cannot find any commands to run go run . but to wait for a debugger to attach to the executable before executing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Thank you Thunder devs for adding this feature fully into Thunder!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I think stablecoins will always have a centralized point of failure. Weather it is an algorithm, or having the coin backed by the actual asset.

I think the best stablecoins are backed by the asset 1 to 1 or a little more then 1 to 1. Most stablecoins that do this are token on smart chain contracts which have another vulnerability which is being a smart contract. Smart contracts could contain a vulnerability and if it does have a vulnerability, a new contract will need to be made and users will have to switch their old token to the new tokens. Also censorship is an issue. https://cryptonews.com/news/tether-takes-action-blacklists-validator-address-linked-25-million-mev-bot-drain-heres-what-happened.htm

And these stablecoins are not private. The only private stablecoin platform out there is Haven but Haven assets are not backed 1 to 1.

I hope there are plently of stablecoins issued on Zano in the future. Zano allows you to create an asset without creating a smart contract. All assets on Zano are private. I would like to see Tether, USDC and other issue stablecoins on Zano. Trusting the issuers on backing the stablecoin and trusting the issuer to secure their private keys to prevent hackers from inflating the asset will be the only vulnerabilities, but you will have privacy and a censorship resistant stablecoin!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

If the AgoraDesk source code is released? Maybe? It can help anyone who wants to create a P2P trading platform. I think Haveno is written in Java and I have a hunch that AgoraDesk back end is not in Java.

view more: next ›