tand86

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The 1 gig wan interface on his router will not run at 1.2gigs. It does not matter if he is over provisioned on the ISP side, that is not the cause of this speedtest saying 1.2.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

“His router is rated for 1gig, meaning it’ll do minimum that amount”

Uh, No? What are you on about lol.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You are still appreciated.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Thankyou for being able to do math. Seriously.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Except its not...and even if you're trying to talk in Gibibytes, its still not.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I think you need to remember we are in /HomeNetworking and not /Networking. I am very aware that spec does not dictate hardware capability. I am very aware that you can run 10gig over cat 5 (and other various configs beyond the "spec") in certain cases. I am very aware that IPSs overprovision. What I am NOT aware of is anyone who has gone to best buy, purchased a modem and wifi-router with gigabit NICs, gone home to their gigabit ISP plan, plugged and played, and magically gotten 1.2Gbps to their client device. Simplifying for the purposes of home networking to say that given a standard Gig NIC > Cat whatever cable > Gig NIC negotiated at 1000Base-T will run ~940Mbps is perfectly valid, especially in the context of this post where the user has one data point showing 1.2Gbps, all other sites showing ~940Mbps, and his set up is what I described above. You are reading way to far into my (I'll agree here) aggressive use of the word "cant" and trying to apply it en masse to all possible situations. In the context of home networking, the OPs issue, and anyone else experiencing similar things, this is quite clearly a bad measurement or a bug. Also, I am not referring to data rates in the brochure. Go run some Iperf tests on the setup I described above and let me know what you get. Verizon does clearly say 940, but I suspect this is because they know when they drop off their ONT with a Gig interface, they know dam well its expected to be ~940Mbps on the top end. They didn't pull this number out of their ass.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Please explain.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

His router has a 1 gig wan interface. This has nothing to do with over-provisioning.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The amount of times I see the word over-provisioned here is comical. Literally not related to what he is seeing. HIS ROUTER HAS A 1GIG WAN INTERFACE, it cannot and will not run at 1.2gbps lol.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Use a more reliable speed test site. The correct answer is you can’t, after some overhead a gigabit port caps out around 940mbps. Anything being reported over that is a bad measurement or a bug.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If I had a dollar for every time someone attempted to “attack” one of my pubic facing servers I probly wouldn’t need a job. The moment you have 443 open on your network you get 100s of bots scanning you a day.

view more: next ›