stuner

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

dass Deutschland auch vor dem Atomausstieg nur einen einstelligen Prozentsatz des Stroms aus den Atomkraftwerken gedeckt hat. Es

Hast du eine Quelle dazu? Der Anteil war vor 2000 wohl bei knapp 30% der Stromerzeugung: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-elec-by-source?country=~DEU

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It says "UNSUPPORTED: VSYNC is not available on the Linux platform." and runs at a stuttery 133 fps. This test shows 144 Hz: https://fpstest.org/refresh-rate-test/ The Nvidia settings app shows 144 Hz + VRR are active and I can see that the cursor is rendered at >70 fps.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

I'm pretty sure that my desktop is drawn at 144 Hz (on the primary display) and xrandr also tells me that that's the active mode. 🤷‍♂️

Edit: This is with Nvidia (proprietary drivers) and VRR monitors.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Is that generally an issue on Linux Mint / Cinnamon X11? I have a 144 Hz and a 70 Hz monitor and they seem to work fine....

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

One way to do it is have a small Python (or any other scripting language really) script that performs text replacements in the Latex source file. This is much easier in Latex because it's plain text. I don't know of a solution that doesn't involve writing your own code (apart from LO/Word serial letters).

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Is using Latex an option? I've done that and it works quite nicely. You can easily populate a template e.g. using Python.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

I'm not sure I follow... Did the Fedora Council actually take a decision?

[–] [email protected] 37 points 3 months ago (12 children)

I understood Matthew's position as "this should be discussed in the Workstation WG first", not as a "no":

in favor of the process outlined above (tl;dr: talk to the Workstation WG, and if that does not come to a satisfying outcome, file a Council ticket for next possibilities).

Post

It also seemed more likely that they would promote KDE without demoting Gnome.

But was there a follow-up on that (e.g. in the Workstation WG)?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

That looks like a software issue... I would try a different distro or a different version of Ubuntu (e.g. 22.04).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Thanks for trying it out on your own system!

In my case, the problem was that the disk never showed up in the Fedora installer. I've quickly reproduced the issue in a VM (but I originally noticed it on bare metal):

Installation Destination

As you can see in fdisk, the disk (/dev/sda) has been recognized correctly by the kernel and works as expected. But somehow the installer only shows the "internal" /dev/vda.

After some further investigation, this seems to be related to the specific USB drives. I tried three different ones. It failed on a USB stick and the original external NVME enclosure. However, it did accept my USB to SATA adapter. So I guess I could install Fedora on my 10-year old HDD... 😐

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Did you do anything special to install Fedora it on the USB drive? I couldn't get it to do that and would be interested in testing F40 that way.

view more: ‹ prev next ›