stonerboner

joined 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

It does when the side with the increase is already a sizably smaller block than the side with increased energy.

Nothing has changed for MAGA, they will always toe the line. But, as for the past two decades, they will lose the popular vote and their only hope will be to subvert democracy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

How about the caution point of POLLS ARE USELESS?

And FYI Trump is waaaaay less popular now. My neighborhood is a maga stronghold. Not a single Trump flag by any house this year, but plenty of Kamala (there were no Biden signs here last election).

Maybe spend your time doing something that isn’t as useless as posting about polls

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Leftism isn’t about being anti-capitalist, though the two can and do overlap quite a bit. Left wing politics is more about what they support as opposed to being against something: pro-human rights. Pro-equality and equity. Pro-education. Pro-healthcare. Pro-environment. Walz is pro all of those things, and his track record exemplifies it.

It may seem like splitting hairs, but the distinction is important. It’s the right wing that only exists in opposition. Their only platform is what they are against.

Compared to many of his Democratic colleagues, he leans much farther left than most. That’s why it’s odd to say he’s not of the left. He is a capitalist who owns not a single stock, bond, real estate, and he doesn’t take money for speaking or have book deals. He’s a lefty capitalist, which is pretty much a diamond in the rough.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 weeks ago

But I’m not a pure socialist, so I don’t pass the purity test to be of the left. Be consistent!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago

He pointed at Twitter’s “success” after Elon took it over as reasons why he is enshittifying Reddit. That comment is why I left Reddit and haven’t looked back.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

We are not using global standards, this is a US paper about US politics.

There may be only one or two successful politicians in the entire US who meet the “global standards,” which would make calling him out for “not being of the left” really fucking stupid.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

That’s absurd. He is left of center in the USA by a wide margin. Saying he’s not of the left or not a leftist is quite the goalpost, especially considering his achievements such as getting statewide free lunch programs at schools.

Socialist does not mean the same thing as leftist, and isn’t the criteria to be considered “of the left.”

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Sigh. Normal people do vote. Republicans haven’t won a national popular in 20 years, and the fluke that won in 2004 only did so because of 9/11. He also won his first term by Supreme Court decision.

Showing up is not our problem. There is zero chance Kamala and Tim don’t absolutely trounce their opposition. The fascists know this, so they will try to subvert democracy instead of win within the system.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Are you suggesting that the tankies are a big enough voting block to qualify Walz as “not of the left?” Big doubt.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Just wondering how the heck Walz can be considered “not of the left.” Looking at his accomplishments with universal background checks, free school lunch etc it seems he’s accomplished more left leaning goals than 99% of his colleagues

view more: ‹ prev next ›