I won't google the definition of words for you. But it's very self-righteous and morally superior if you ever get around to looking those up.
stanleytweedle
Right, their feelings about a dead hatemonger are none of your business so 'calling them out' is painfully self-righteous.
As a result, more tech workers find themselves in what IDC described as "hybrid roles that combine traditional development activities with activities that formerly were associated with operations professionals who historically had few or no development-oriented responsibilities."
I guess I've always been in what they're calling a 'hybrid role' because this doesn't seem like a new thing. Every good sysadmin I've worked with has some coding skills, not necessarily for developing software products but for solving IT problems. I can't tell if they're calling that 'development' or saying sysadmin need to learn to develop software products. Either way doesn't seem like they're talking about the same sector I'm familiar with.
I'm looking at a post saying they are going dark and even offer Lemmy/c/sysadmin as an alternative. Am I missing something?
Clutch those pearls!
You're an archivist. Though I like that you own the term 'data hoarder' so nobody can use it as a pejorative.
So besides owning any electronic device what are some other examples of common moral failings that you think equate to Robinson's hateful career? Driving a car?
I think that would be great. There's a wealth of posts and comments that users have made that deserve to be preserved and shared. It would help Lemmy grow and just be a good policy to make sure Reddit doesn't control access to the content those users generated.
As long as you link or referce back to the post and user I don't see how that would be legally or morally problematic. It's all public anyway, but IANAL so this this not legal advice, just my thoughts.
Everyone is a hypocrite at some point, most people don't make a global enterprise of it though. Are you unclear on how that distinction matters?
I got that you think being an average consumer is morally equivalent to being a televangelist that blamed 9/11 on gay people. What other funny comparisons like that can you make?
You didn't though, you just made up a silly comparison.
The fact that you think it requires any 'defense' is kind of funny.