spider

It's little wonder he is considered an authority in that subject. Undoubtedly, though, he's given nowhere near that much thought (or any at all) to trans politics...He's more likely to fall in line, then, with the societal view of his generation's time.

He's also more likely to be full of himself.

https://annas-archive.org/

I'm hitting a paywall, so...

archived version

Because rich people are experts on everything.

/s (of course)

details here

video footage here (YouTube short)

Republicans just need to attach their trans extermination legislation to bills that fund the military or other key government functions, and the Dems will vote for it in large numbers.

Yeah, it sucks when that happens; then if the Dems don't vote for it, it gets framed by the Republicans as they only care about LGBTQ issues.

edit: For what it's worth, have a look at this:

Democrats will lean on this tactic to take on Trump during his second term

Understood; I'm referring strictly to damage control.

After what happened in November, baby steps in two years are preferable to nothing for four.

Indeed; it was more or less a rhetorical question.

well-put

at least for the next four years

Maybe two if enough people get off their asses and vote during the midterms.

Can anyone explain how this waste of taxpayer dollars is "conservative"?

"We're sorry to inform you that an intellectual property claim has been filed by UnitedHealth Group Inc against this design of yours on TeePublic"

If UnitedHealth really filed that claim, they're even more tone-deaf than I thought.