somename

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Oh my god it’s Rahm Emanuel.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Some nuclear disasters are a bit overstated honestly. Like Three Mile Island was a tiny amount of radiation. Coal ash releases more radiation regularly. It’s just part of our normal “accepted” energy production and doesn’t get the media focus.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago

You have sources on that first bit lol? I’m not sure what you’re talking about.

Unless you’re meaning jokes about fascist voters falling down a manhole or something?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

I think they’re counting on a large amount of them not caring once the symbols are out of sight, and after they smooth over the initial outrage with a bit of PR.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Something that's important to note though, is that the Cat example isn't a great way to envision this phenomenon in general. Schrodinger's Cat was actually made as an argument against this interpretation, by blowing the behavior up to a macro scale, where it seemed absurd. While you can draw analogues and all that, I'd recommend against really thinking that macro scale objects are in a multitude of obviously different states at once, all the time. It's a path to some of the really kooky fake-science "quantum" stuff that get's repeated.

Like, you're never going to see a physicist argue that a person is both alive and dead in another room, because of the technical chance that they tunneled halfway through the wall.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

What's funny is that physicists approximate and round way more than engineers do.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It really is oppression to get responded to.

view more: ‹ prev next ›