qazwsxedcrfv000

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Those letters are often void threats. ISPs are not really the right plaintiff to bring priacy cases to court. The only thing they can do is to terminate service but that is obviously not in their interest.

Just if you are already paying for a VPN and the download/upload speed is acceptable, there is no point in getting yourself in trouble no matter how small the odd is.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What? Do you have only a black/white mentality? Of course not. We have a mixed system, as does almost the rest of the world that isn’t a dictatorship. Capitalism and socialism are not mutually exclusive; in fact, there’s a compelling argument that one really can’t exist without the other.

We have a mixed system. But we are capitalistic leaning are we not? Being capitalist or socialist are not discrete choices, but a continuous scale. I agree with you on that.

Btw the 1929 great crash was facilitate and exacerbated by lax Federal Reserve control of money issuance and the drastic tightening after the crash. This is actually an argument against centralized money.

Yes, that’s called socialism. The government levies taxes from its people, then the government redistributes the wealth, that’s the very definition of socialism.

Well a joint stock company also does that. It engages in production. It does redistribute wealth. For a long time, public services e.g. firefighting, were provided by private entities. Is it socialism? I don't think so. It has to involve coercion, say, via monopoly of violence to be socialism as it is a form of governing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Capitalism as a classification/concept did not exist does not mean the practice did not exist. Capital (both in kind and in mind) accumulation has been occurring since even the stone age. Of course we would not call those societies capitalistic.

Plus I am replying to the comment that tries to dismember science from finance/economy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So are you saying, after the New Deal, the US was/is no longer practicing capitalism? I am afraid I have to disagree.

The US government did not produce all the technologies. Many of them are from private companies. Yes the government funded them with public money, public money paid by the taxpayers.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes so we need to understand it. You don't think our countless historians and social scientists are doing their work purely for fun or do you?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And please enlighten me on where the resources come from and how they are allocated. Do the coal/oil/gas buried deep under earth dig themselves out or the cattle/pigs/chickens will automagically grow and serve themselves on our dinner table? Command economies can only work spontaneously. The Nazi and the USSR both did have made spectacular achievements over the course of their existence. But is the process sustainable? No. That was why they both failed eventually.

The US did not become the arsenal of democracies by centralizing all the industries during the second World War. The private industries involved a lot. You can say that paved way for the future military-industrial complex. Even the secretive Manhattan project had a number of corporate partners.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your preference may vary but I would not recommend anyone trying to "clone" anything on a running system.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

"Improving things" is not a justification for ignorance. I have never seen things getting "improved" by someone ignorant of the building blocks or even worse motivated to destroy the building blocks on which we all stand.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Science cannot exist without finance. Science and its practitioners do not exist in a vacuum. Who are going to feed the "scientists"? Or who are going to be the "scientists"? It takes time and resources to train "scientists". It also takes time and resources to ensure knowledge is inherited and shared. That is why renaissance and enlightenment is such a big deal in history.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Asus also has a similar line. Just they carry and market this line of products in limited countries only.

It is also not that odd to see Asus grabbing the Intel NUC business. Intel NUCs have been contract manufactured by Pegatron, the OEM manufacturing spin-off of the original ASUSTeK Computer Inc., whose majority shareholder is still ASUSTek.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have been using it since v1.1x and that was released around a year ago. In other words, it has been running good enough for me for a year. Features are added and bugs are getting fixed along the way. I have not experienced any major break.

view more: ‹ prev next ›