prfrnir

joined 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

If I use the LCD back screen I would have noticed. But I usually don't and so there was no warning.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

I think the value of whatever you decide to do will be correlated to the effort you put in. Dumping a bunch of photos online, whether it be Flickr, Instagram, or another photo sharing site probably won't generate as much attention or be as fulfilling as a well thought out, but ultimately more time consuming, venture.

Off the top of my head, I would imagine a story or narrative combined with the images may be the most obvious use. A year on the road with a politician is probably plenty of material for something like that. My take is that I don't think photos alone of a politician at work is enticing enough. It might have worked for a more exciting individual or profession (athlete, film director, etc.) but I have no idea of the photo content.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I used some very expired film on a trip to DC. Lab developed it and said it came out blank. Finally got to scanning my negatives a year later and for fun, I digitized those negatives. I have some very faint images. Not the greatest, but better than not having them at all.

Also, twice I went outside with my camera without first loading an SD card. I don't think I got amazing pictures, but I'll never know since my camera doesn't warn you if you don't have an SD card loaded.