I don't want them making money out of the content I voluntarily and freely created. I was contributing in subs like C_programming to help newcomers. I have been thinking that all these posts I made will help the next AI - and Reddit (not me) will get paid for it.
So I mass edited each post and comment I made. They won't get away with my data. My data belongs to me, not them.
D1 has a couple of tragic moments (the Butcher encounter as witnessed by the townsfolks, the end of the story itself) but overall it's more a story in a dark universe than a dark story where everyone loses people they care about.
D2 also has a couple of tragic places (I am mostly thinking of the Act 3 Zakarum Temple filled with blood; or the massacre in the Act 2 Palace) but you arrive after it happened. You don't see the deed happening. So it's more of a power story in a dark universe rather than a sad and dark one.
D3, well, is D3. Characters have as much power as gods, villains keep rambling endlessly about how they will shatter your world until you kill them, rinse and repeat.. It's power fantasy
But D4 is really a dark story. You don't just arrive after the fact like in D2, you really see massacres, dismemberment, sadism, blood sacrifices etc.. happening all over. And it's not just in a couple of places in the story. It's really everywhere. It's like the D4 writers passed the message "Each quest should have a grim ending". Or rather, they saw how people wanted Diablo to get darker after the D3 fiasco, so they listened (a bit too much) and cranked the button all the way to "grim" and "sad".
In general I have very mixed opinion about D4 story. It has just too much grimness. It's like every other person in Sanctuary is on a frenzy rampage to kill, eat or chop parts of their neighbors. And, on the opposite side of the spectrum, we have a certain prime evil reduced to bargaining with humans where they should be the very essence of terror/hatred/destruction... It does not make any sense
Larger instances will either have more donators or close their subscriptions if it really is unsustainable.
The more Lemmy grows, the more instances will show up, which will help spread the load.
You speak of sustainability but Lemmy survived the wave of incoming Redditors without much downtime. It's really impressive that this growth could happen. That's the power of decentralized systems: they scale!
Je ne suis pas trop Youtube ou les blogs du coup je ne peux pas te conseiller..
Mais je trouve ça super de poster en français alors que tu ne maitrises pas encore la langue :) N'hésite pas à participer aux différents sujets ici, je pense que tu peux apprendre beaucoup
Reddit broke my trust. No way I'm going back there unless a major change occurs such as the CEO leaving to make place for a new one who is not as profit driven. But no way that's gonna happen
Ich spreche nur ein bischen Deutsch aber ich verstehe dieses Meme !
La série The Expanse est intéressante pour voir quels dimensions pourraient prendre des combats spatials (en supposant une grosse évolution en terme de voyage inter planètes et de colonisation)
People will volunteer to do the job because it is something they (and everyone) needs done
I did volunteer work in several associations. From personal experience I can tell you that "someone will do it, a volunteer will rise" should not be relied upon. I have seen many instances of tasks that everyone was aware of, and yet no one wanted to do; even though they were important. At the end of the day, guess who completed them? The president of the association, because that's their responsibility ultimately; until they got sick of always doing these tasks so they did not want to be president again the next year.
In the case of a society where no one is responsible for given tasks, I can only guess that vital tasks would be left undone and the whole society would be collapsing. Imagine getting your electricity cut each day of "insert your most favorite celebration here" because no one felt like working during celebration day. Imagine fire becoming widespread and burning every building because at that particular day, there were not enough people with fireman skills around to extinguish the initial fire
We need to have assigned roles and responsibilities based on our skills. How do we do that in a world where you can say "Na, I know I'm the only expert on this available right now, but I don't feel like doing it today" and get away with it?
There is a gap between conceiving a system and maintaining it. Sure, there are architects who conceived sewers. But I doubt they went inside to maintain it on a regular basis.
I agree about teaching the ins and outs of each anatomy - like periods for girls and erections for boys. Could also teach them about pleasure - what are orgasms and how it works in the body.
But i don't think its the right age to teach how to give each other orgasms
I don't see how it's homophobic to be against sex education at 10 years old.
Doesn't it look a little young to you? Are you expecting a 10 yo child to engage in sexual activities?
Selon l'instrument ça peut être compliqué de jouer tout en déambulant