oscar

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (10 children)

Using a the ubuntu 24.04 docker image for testing, I was able to disable automatic indentation with this config in ~/.config/nvim/init.lua:

vim.cmd("filetype indent off")

If you prefer using vim syntax it would instead be the following in ~/.config/nvim/init.vim:

filetype indent off

Note: it seems this file is not loaded if a init.lua file is present in that directory

Edit to add: So the reason this is required is, similar to vim (so you may already be familiar with this), there are filetype-specific configurations loaded. These usually reside in /usr/share/nvim/runtime/<plugin/indent/syntax/etc>/<filetype>. You can configure what files to load using the :filetype command.

There's more info here: https://neovim.io/doc/user/filetype.html

Second edit: Also when filetype indent/plugin/syntax is on, it seems to be loaded after your user config, so it overrides it. You can investigate if your actual config was applied or not by running, for example, :set autoindent? or :set cindent?. If the values do not match your configuration, it was likely overridden by :filetype. This was the case for me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Gotcha. That's actually good because it will be easier to troubleshoot. I will try to reproduce in a barebones config and see if I can figure something out. What language are you editing, and what version of neovim do you use? Distro may also be relevant in case they package some indent.vim file(s).

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (13 children)

Are you using treesitter? I think that has an option to handle indentation, but I'm not sure if it's enabled by default.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

nam is assigned the value returned by input.

This is not some edge case behavior by the input function. This is always how function calls work. You can think of it like substituting input('Who are you? ') with the value returned by it, which is the string typed in by the user in this case.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

How did you install neovim? If you installed from source, double check that you followed the instructions, i.e. install build dependencies and then run:

make CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo
sudo make install

Also, double check the version of nvim in your PATH matches:

nvim --version
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Drop oh-my-zsh and look for something else to customize your prompt. I like Powerlevel10k but Starship is good too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

C is a pretty simple language and relatively easy to learn. But it's a lot harder to be proficient with.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

(Preface: i dont know much about this)

mkdev.h is not available in arch either. I even tried searching the repos with pacman -F mkdev.h.

Looking up makedev (which I'm assuming is the lib that cpio uses from it) it seems that it is available in sysmacros.h for linux and mkdev.h for solaris, see for example: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dri-devel/patch/[email protected]/

So I tried just commenting that include out but got a bunch of other errors about multiple definitions of some enums (defined in cpio.h), and so I gave up.

I don't like GNU either but I went the more free route of BSD instead.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Can't they just use JSDoc?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (3 children)

By the same argument, wouldn't GPL and other copyleft licenses be considered non-free as well since you are not free to do whatever you want with the source? For example, incorporating it into a proprietary project, refusing to provide the source to users upon request, or not disclosing attribution, etc. The latter would even go against the terms of permissive licenses.

Clearly defining what free, and by extension FOSS, means is very relevant.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It seems that no lua is packaged with pandoc-cli (By looking at the package contents of https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/pandoc-cli/)

So if I were you I would first try the AUR and see if there's any package there that does.

view more: ‹ prev next ›