nyan

joined 9 months ago
[–] nyan 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Raw qemu at the command line for the one I use on a daily basis (not recommended for the average user). VirtualBox if I need to spin something up quickly but don't expect to need to keep it past the current testing cycle.

[–] nyan 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

ext4 on all hard disks, but my installs are all several years old at this point, and I might choose differently if I were starting over from scratch. The boot partition on the ancient laptop might actually be ext2; I don't remember and it's certainly old enough that that might still have been preferred Gentoo procedure when I first set it up. Removable media might be ext3, ext4, or vfat, depending on compatibility needs and how long ago I formatted it. If I buy an SD card or USB stick that turns out to be preformatted in exFAT, I reformat it before use to ensure everything can read it.

They're all solidly reliable filesystems (well, except for the vfat), but perhaps not the most featureful.

[–] nyan 2 points 4 months ago

In the general case, no, but there are some rare specific cases where that does work.

If you're trying to produce Linux media that will boot on a single-board computer that has an onboard bootloader, like a Pi 4, you can indeed just partition the target medium and copy the files manually (been there, done that, working with a custom Gentoo install with no ISO).

If the bootloader has to be on the target medium (as it would for a desktop or laptop), then that won't work unless you also do a manual bootloader install after copying everything. Not impossible, but at that point you're hitting the level of complexity where it's easier to figure out the correct dd command.

(As for Windows? Don't even bother. It hates being worked on with anything but its own tools.)

[–] nyan 5 points 4 months ago

Well, you're not affected by this specific bug, anyway. Whether you're virtuous in other aspects of your life is beyond the knowledge of anyone here. 😜

[–] nyan 14 points 4 months ago

Not all distros need to appeal to the mainstream. Diversity is a good thing in and of itself. In biology, it makes ecologies more robust, and there's no reason it shouldn't do the same for a software ecology.

The day when there's no longer a place in Linux for Slackware, Gentoo, LFS, Alpine, and other independent non-mainstream distros is the day I move to BSD.

[–] nyan 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Gentoo installation is time-consuming, but Gentoo maintenance usually isn't. Just allocate portage a couple of cores while you do something else with the rest of the computer. Or leave the update to run overnight, if you're on a potato.

[–] nyan 6 points 4 months ago

So of the three happiest distros, two aren't very concerned with mainstream appeal and will carry on contentedly doing their thing while ignoring rankings like this. Sounds about right.

[–] nyan 4 points 4 months ago

Exactly what I was thinking. "People who are already less happy tend to gravitate towards Firefox" is as valid a takeaway from those graphs as anything else. (Also, where are all the other browsers? I'd expect Edge and Safari, at least, to be represented, even if Vivaldi and various Firefox forks were not.)

[–] nyan 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There are some older DE-agnostic virtual keyboards (svkbd, xvkbd, matchbox), but they may not work in Wayland, if that's what you're using.

[–] nyan 7 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Distro best added to the "Power-user distros to avoid" list: Gentoo (saying that as a Gentoo user).

I disagree with your claim that doing things like installation steps manually is necessarily a bad idea, though. It depends on your goal. Obviously it isn't the fastest way to get things up and running, and as such it isn't appropriate for newcomers (or for mass corporate deployments). If your goal is to learn about the lower levels of the system, or to produce something highly customized, then it becomes appropriate. Occasionally, it pays dividends in the form of being able to quickly fix a system that's been broken by automation that didn't quite work as expected. Anyway, I'd suggest rewording that bit of your Arch screed.

[–] nyan 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Too lazy to check github . . . will it work on systems that don't run Gnome? It would be nice not to have to figure out how to hand-write a GTK4 theme as I did with GTK3.

[–] nyan 2 points 5 months ago

I think that's the old locolor icon theme. The version I have around is modified for TDE, but the original should exist somewhere out there (if OpenSUSE is still offering KDE3, then they probably have it).

view more: ‹ prev next ›