ninjirate

Found this that works really well. Dawn + vinegar has already been mentioned but try it with the rubbing alcohol as well
https://cleaninghow.to/how-to-make-an-eco-friendly-homemade-bathroom-cleaner/

Using firefox+ublock origin. Showed up once for me but I found out that youtube enchancer also has their own ad blocker. Once I disable their ad blocker I haven't had any issues since.

Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency. It requires you to watch till the end to get the full payoff and everything clicks together and makes sense but I thought it was fun and out there.

100% agree and while at it I don't think any single family homes or rowhouse/townhouses should be owned by corporations. Apartments and such I can understand the building owned by a management company that only does long term rentals but otherwise homes should be owned by people.

What about the husband/father? No way he wasn't in on it as well

Damn this seems like a hot take given the comments but I think these rules are dumb. If I go on a two week vacation somewhere else I should be able to rent out my place for those two weeks. The issue isn't AirBnB as a whole, it's people buying up places for the express intention of only using it for AirBnB,

There should be some cap on often a place can be used for short term rentals like 4 weeks out of the year, enough that people who vacation somewhere else can use AirBnb and low enough that it makes more financial sense for people to rent it out long term instead of short.

I'm all for this especially as someone that likes SFF the fewer cables the better but like many others are saying this should defs be an open standard

Why is that every single one of these posters look like it was made by a junior high kid who just learned about word art?

Is there not some way to involve the authorities? I feel like FBI/CIA or other foreign agencies would love to track down whoever is distributing. Like set up some sort of honeypot instance to catch them

Look on the bright side right?

As a non american last I heard about this some business owners are suing because they didn't take out any students loans and thus wouldn't be eligible for the forgiveness right?

Does that mean if the SCOTUS sides against the forgiveness then others would be able to sue to get the forgiven business loans to be paid back?

Another beginner here but I think the pin in this case is the knight on e6 pinned to the rook e8. If that black's knight moves to take g5 then the exchanges end up with white losing both rooks.