nicfab

The EDPS published two Opinions: one on the proposal for a Regulation on a Financial Data Access Framework and one on the proposal for a Regulation and Directive on payment services in the EU’s internal market. Both proposals aim to foster the sharing of data to broaden the offer of financial services and products, whilst providing individuals or organisations control over the processing of their financial data.

[continue reading on the source web page]

L’intelligenza artificiale (IA) continua a trovare successo in una vasta gamma di settori, questo trionfo è direttamente collegato alla necessità imperativa di garantirne la sicurezza. L’Adversarial Machine Learning (ML) è un insieme di tecniche che gli avversari utilizzano per attaccare i sistemi di apprendimento automatico. Conoscere questa disciplina è fondamentale per comprendere e valutare i potenziali rischi a cui i sistemi di IA sono sottoposti da azioni avverse di attaccanti malintenzionati.

[continua a leggere sulla pagina web della fonte]

On 21 June 2023, following an inquiry concerning a complaint received against Airbnb Ireland UC (Airbnb), the Data Protection Commission (DPC) adopted a decision.

The DPC commenced this inquiry on 4 March 2022, on foot of a complaint that Airbnb had unlawfully requested a copy of the complainant’s ID (ID) in order to verify their identity which had not been previously requested by Airbnb. The complainant further contended that this went against the principles of data minimisation and that Airbnb had also failed to comply with the principles of transparency and provision of information. Initial attempts by the complainant to verify their identity had been rejected by Airbnb as the ID provided did not meet their criteria. Ultimately the complainant verified their identity.

[continue reading on the source web page]

The Indian President Droupadi Murmu on Friday granted assent to the Digital Personal Data Protection Bill (DPDPB) after it was unanimously passed by both houses of the parliament last week, marking a significant step towards securing people's information.

[continue reading on the source web page]

Questo articolo è la continuazione, come seconda parte, di quello quello già pubblicato dal titolo “Le Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PETs): categoria sempre attuale parte 1”.

In questo contributo, intendiamo evidenziare alcuni aspetti operativi e pratici relativi alle PET, fornendo una nostra descrizione di quelle che riteniamo essere attualmente le principali soluzioni.

[continua a leggere sulla pagina web della fonte]

This article is a continuation, as a second part, of the one already published entitled “Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PETs): an ever-present category part 1.”

This contribution highlights some operational and practical aspects of PETs, describing what we believe are currently the leading solutions.

[continue reading on the source web page]

Leaders from the AI research world appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee to discuss and answer questions about the nascent technology. Their broadly unanimous opinions generally fell into two categories: we need to act soon, but with a light touch — risking AI abuse if we don’t move forward, or a hamstrung industry if we rush it.

The panel of experts at today’s hearing included Anthropic co-founder Dario Amodei, UC Berkeley’s Stuart Russell and longtime AI researcher Yoshua Bengio.

[continue reading on the source web page]

Among the great challenges posed to democracy today is the use of technology, data, and automated systems in ways that threaten the rights of the American public. Too often, these tools are used to limit our opportunities and prevent our access to critical resources or services. These problems are well documented. In America and around the world, systems supposed to help with patient care have proven unsafe, ineffective, or biased. Algorithms used in hiring and credit decisions have been found to reflect and reproduce existing unwanted inequities or embed new harmful bias and discrimination. Unchecked social media data collection has been used to threaten people’s opportunities, undermine their privacy, or pervasively track their activity—often without their knowledge or consent.

[continue reading on the source web page]

he Council has today approved the regulation to strengthen Europe's semiconductor ecosystem, better known as the 'Chips Act'. This is the last step in the decision-making procedure.

The Chips Act aims to create the conditions for the development of a European industrial base in the field of semiconductors, attract investment, promote research and innovation and prepare Europe for any future chip supply crisis. The programme should mobilise €43 billion in public and private investment (€3.3 billion from the EU budget), with the objective of doubling the EU’s global market share in semiconductors, from 10% now to at least 20% by 2030.

[continue reading on the source web page]

PETs, an acronym for the phrase “Privacy Enhancing Technologies,” constitute a phenomenon that is not new and dates back to the mid-1990s.

In fact, in 1995 the title of a groundbreaking report commissioned by the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, Canada, and the Dutch Data Protection Authority1 contained the phrase “Privacy-enhancing technologies: the path to anonymity.”

[continue reading on the source web page]

Le PET, acronimo dell’espressione “Privacy Enhancing Technologies” (Tecnologie di potenziamento della privacy), costituiscono un fenomeno che non è nuovo e risale a metà degli anni ‘90.

Difatti, nel 1995 il titolo di un innovativo rapporto commissionato dal Commissario per l’informazione e la privacy dell’Ontario, in Canada, e dall’Autorità olandese per la protezione dei dati1 conteneva la frase “Privacy-enhancing technologies: the path to anonymity” (Tecnologie per la tutela della privacy: il percorso verso l’anonimato).

[continua a leggere sulla pagina web della fonte]

The draft regulation introduces mandatory cybersecurity requirements for the design, development, production and making available on the market of hardware and software products to avoid overlapping requirements stemming from different pieces of legislation in EU member states.

The proposed regulation will apply to all products that are connected either directly or indirectly to another device or network. There are some exceptions for products, for which cybersecurity requirements are already set out in existing EU rules, for example on medical devices, aviation, or cars.

The proposal aims to fill the gaps, clarify the links, and make the existing cybersecurity legislation more coherent by ensuring that products with digital components, for example ‘Internet of Things’ (IoT) products, become secure throughout the whole supply chain and throughout their whole lifecycle.

Finally, the proposed regulation also allows consumers to take cybersecurity into account when selecting and using products that contain digital elements by providing users the opportunity to make informed choices of hardware and software products with the proper cybersecurity features.

[continue reading on the source web page]