mlfh

The real challenge facing a kremlin linux fork isn't opposition, it's deciding what to do once they realize there aren't any maternity wards in the kernel they can shoot ballistic missiles at.

Those kids and their families should sue the fuck out of him.

Mom, can we have military alliance?

Mom: we have military alliance at home

Military alliance at home: 🇷🇺🇰🇵🤡

With rootless podman, the internal PUID/PGID being set to 1000 within the container is likely being remapped into your subuid/subgid range (eg, if your /etc/subuid is cyno:100000:65536, id 1000 within the container becomes id 101000 outside of it). You can use podman's --userns=keep-id parameter to map your own host uid 1000 to id 1000 within the container.

Winnipeg

How in the world does propaganda supporting the aims of a right-wing fascist dictator equate to "deviating leftward"?

Forgejo, a Gitea fork used by Codeberg. I chose it because it's got the right balance of features to weight for my small use case, it has FOSS spirit, and it's got a lovely package maintainer for FreeBSD that makes deployment and maintenance easy peasy (thanks Stefan <3).

If you're trying to have password auth be a second layer on top of key auth (requiring a password after connecting with your ssh key), you can add the following to your server's sshd_conf:

AuthenticationMethods "publickey,password"

/dev/sda is the whole raw disk - you typically don't want to directly interact with /dev/sda, unless you are partitioning or overwriting it. There are a few layers between that device and the files:

• raw disk - /dev/sda
• disk partition - /dev/sda1
• luks container - when unlocked, mapped to /dev/mapper/{name}
• ext4 filesystem inside the luks container, mounted somewhere like /mnt, /media, etc

You'll need to find where that ext4 filesystem is mounted, and run the chown command on that. You can run lsblkand see a tree of the above hierarchy, with the ext4 filesystem's mountpount shown in the right-hand column.

Nikita Khrushchev, in his own memoir, stating clearly that the USSR could not have won the war on its own:

I would like to express my candid opinion about Stalin's views on whether the Red Army and the Soviet Union could have coped with Nazi Germany and survived the war without aid from the United States and Britain. First, I would like to tell about some remarks Stalin made and repeated several times when we were "discussing freely" among ourselves. He stated bluntly that if the United States had not helped us, we would not have won the war. If we had had to fight Nazi Germany one on one, we could not have stood up against Germany's pressure, and we would have lost the war. No one ever discussed this subject officially, and I don't think Stalin left any written evidence of his opinion, but I will state here that several times in conversations with me he noted that these were the actual circumstances. He never made a special point of holding a conversation on the subject, but when we were engaged in some kind of relaxed conversation, going over international questions of the past and present, and when we would return to the subject of the path we had traveled during the war, that is what he said. When I listened to his remarks, I was fully in agreement with him, and today I am even more so.

-Khrushchev, Nikita Sergeevich; Khrushchev, Serge (2004). Memoirs of Nikita Khrushchev: Commissar, 1918–1945. Penn State Press. pp. 638–639.

Friendly reminder that lemmy votes are public

Makes you wonder who the hell was still running kaspersky in the US..