mint_tamas

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (4 children)

The cure is probably some dried animal that’s shredded and dissolved in water and originates from 6000 years ago and totally demonstrates the superiority of Chinese medicine.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I cannot imagine a less appealing feature than an AI theme generator. Is this really something that people want?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

The entire macromedia suite was so good. I had so much fun and learned so much as a teen.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Theoretically, what would the utility of AI summaries in Google Search if not getting exact information?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

So what, you keep an ungoogled-chromium around and use it occasionally for compatibility, if you really need to. Doesn’t mean you are obligated to use it as your daily driver.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

FWIW they are cannibalizing ads right now with AI summaries, since people will navigate less to websites (in the world where they are useful, which they don’t seem to be at the moment).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

It works if you take it for its function: to signal the body that night is starting in 1-2 hours, and take it in a small dose (1-2mg). It’s not a sedative, like many seem to assume. It’s best to take it when you start your night routine.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Peer review, for all its flaws is a good minimum before a paper is worth taking seriously.

In your original comment you said tha model collapse can be easily avoided with this technique, which is notably different from it being mitigated. I’m not saying that these findings are not useful, just that you are overselling them a bit with this wording.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

That paper is yet to be peer reviewed or released. I think you are jumping into conclusion with that statement. How much can you dilute the data until it breaks again?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Handful of cases only in the US. Globally there were around 900 cases to date (starting 2003).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

The problem is that idiots drinking H5N1 milk might bring about human-to-human transmission of it which will be a dire situation. To date, around 50% of the 200-something human cases resulted in death. For comparison, the worst mortality rates of covid were around 20-25% in the very beginning.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Is your argument for bombing being the right decision the same (that it resulted in less bloodshed overall)? If so, how can you estimate the body count of the alternative (a prolonged conventional war, I assume)?

view more: ‹ prev next ›