In fact, I've heard people most likely worked less back in the olden days pf pre-industrial scarcity, or at least took entire seasons off when the crops they grew weren't expected to yield anything.
meowMix2525
Sure, in language that obfuscates their actual goals and after all the other subversive shit like installing their puppet judges to the supreme court that led to those goals becoming remotely achievable against the will of voters at large.
You're assuming they can read at all
Nah, you got it right. Knowing nothing else about him (my memory and attention seeming to outright reject all of what has been relayed to me) his face is pretty punchable.
Don't worry, they stopped planting female trees so they won't have to worry about that and instead we just clean up the pollen from the male trees with our lungs
Yeah well too bad she already endorsed Trump at the RNC and these fucks can't ever admit to being wrong
It sounds like the answer to your question is probably within that same video you watched.
They didn't actually use either of those terms.
Dressed in a white shirt, dark blazer and bright red MAGA cap, Trump was railing against illegal immigration when shots rang out at 6:08 pm. "Take a look at what happened..." he said, his words cut off by four shots in quick succession.
Trump grabbed his right ear as repeated shouts of "get down!" were heard, before a fifth and sixth shot. The former president crouched down behind the lectern as Secret Service agents moved in around him. Screams were heard in the crowd.
Within four seconds further shots were fired, prompting more supporters to get down while additional agents rushed to the stage. Seventeen seconds after the first shots, a final pop was heard and a woman screamed.
So it could be that all 6 of the initial shots were from the shooter. I think its safe to say at least the first 4 were probably all him (and I do remember the number 4 from the accounts I heard), but the ones following are more ambiguous. Doesn't look like they've released many specifics yet though.
I mean the shooter was shot down so at least one of those shots had to be SS. But accounts on the scene said they heard a few quiet pops followed by louder ones from the counter sniper that was closer to them. Shouldn't be hard to find a source if you look it up, I'm not able to at the moment.
I think he only got like 2 shots off. The others you heard were secret service returning fire.
Yeah. It's just too bad the democrats are adopting the republican stance on that to somehow show republican voters that their representatives aren't actually committed to keeping those promises so much as being contrarian to democrats, as if they need any more proof of that fact and will suddenly see the light, rather than simply challenging them on their outright lies and winning over the people that actually value evidence-based rhetoric.