mayTay

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes. If it's paid to ONLY be on Steam.

If we follow your "logic" yes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Wow... Seriously? No they release it for their launcher exclusively not for pc.

If you're talking platforms Sony is WAY MORE OPEN than Epic ever will be, we can just pray they fail hard and this practice doesn't become the norm (again)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

So just let me get that straight.

You also don't like exclusives and want ppl to be able to play the way they want.

...and somehow Playstation - actively releasing their games on PC, investing time, money & effort - are worse than Epic who just want to lure ppl to their store/launcher and actively taking away the choice of playing method?

Alrighty then...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (7 children)

It's better than keeping them artificially locked behind a launcher for no reason whatsoever, yes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (9 children)

They are literally releasing their games on another platform that actually requires them to put money into the project again to develop a port. So yeah, even PS atm is better than Epic.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (11 children)

This list is just another argument against epic... artificial exclusives. For a FUCKING LAUNCHER. Even fucking Playstation, EA and Ubisoft opened up.

Fuck Epic.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exactly.

I think everyone who wants all 3 and bashing them over just adding one is actually having fun with the game. This post is just stupid.