masterspace

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Yup. People gonna have to move.

Remember when people said that climate change would cost us trillions of dollars? This is why.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My guess would be that

a) building their next social network on an open platform will let antitrust regulators off their back

and/or b) a Twitter clone sounds less sexy then a web3 / decentralized fediverse play. Meta has chased every other bandwagon (metaverse, ai, etc), it's entirely possible this is just them always chasing the hot new thing so that they don't miss out. They certainly aren't going to let themselves be Blackberry and refuse to change, they'd rather desperately copy every hot new thing and change quickly to always have an offering that appeals to their customers good enough

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And it would only be a protocol extension when it would be returned upstream, which I highly doubt that Facebook’s parent company Meta would do that.

Oh yeah, Meta definitely never contributes anything back to the open source community, I type into a React frontend, that uses a GraphQl communication protocol to an API built using node, watchman, and a variety of other meta made or sponsored projects.

/S

https://github.com/orgs/facebook/repositories?type=all

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

There are over 2B Instagram accounts actually and over 115M in the US alone, so yeah, they definitely didn't just starting counting them all.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

You know what's irrelevant to the current conversation about how they have so many users they don't need us?

How many fediverse accounts are there total? A couple hundred thousand? And how many of those are duplicates across instances?

Whether or not all those users stick is irrelevant, the user counts for lemmy / kbin also won't have all of them stick. The point is that they do not need us or our content. They can hit a bill without even supporting activitypub.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, this feels like a massive corporation with massive marketing and market research departments succinctly breaking down a concept that most on the fediverse nerd out too much to do.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Do you know what happens to protocols over time? They get extended with user facing features or they stop being used and die.

Once again, Meta got 100M users in a week, they do not need to support the fediverse. Stop acting like this is some calculation and not just them building the same basic features they have in their other platforms that users expect into their new one.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I shouldn't have doubted Apple's campaign for minimalism > functionality

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's more like locking your door and barring it up really good and making it inconvenient for you to get in or out and makes your place less appealing to others, and at the same time you've got several wide open doors behind you.

Federating from threads accomplishes nothing. It's just echo chamber hysteria. Threads isn't even organized around communities, it's organized around people, by default no Threads users would be in Lemmy communities and we wouldn't see any of their content.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lmao at you complaining about toxicity when you're toxically judging and gatekeeping 2 Billion people.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

In Apple's case it's a subtle encouragement to buy their watch.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure it's just to cut costs / complexity / part counts in lower end phones, and higher end phones will use an always on display.

Though worth noting that the Nothing Phone 1 & 2 include pretty snazzy LEDs on the back that are used for notifications amongst other things.

view more: next ›