lemmy_eat_world

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ethnostates are not democracies. Also, Israel is doing everything it can to drag the US into a war in the middle east because of the whole genocide and antagonizing Iran and Lebanon thing. So yeah, not a very good democracy or strategic ally.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I don't know much about Proton. Isn't their back end proprietary though?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's actually a good point too: Vaultwarden is fully open source. The official Bitwarden server also has proprietary components.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago

Not pedantic at all. Google lied about RCS being an open standard.

The pedantic point would be saying that RCS, the protocol, is technically open, but the specific implementation that Google is pushing and being adopted is proprietary 🤓

So yeah. Totally fair point and fuck Google for their RCS bait-and-switch.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Don't get me wrong: BW is still a pretty good service, and the proprietary code is still readable by anyone, but the fact that they're moving a bunch of their previously open source licensed code to something that's source available is definitely unfortunate.

KeePass, on the other hand, has tons of actually open source clients, which definitely gives them an edge for people that don't mind syncing their own DB.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Their new, native android app is also using more and more of their proprietary SDK. It's not something they're trying to fix.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 2 weeks ago (15 children)

Bitwarden. Most people think that their application is open source, but more and more of their code has shifted from the GPL/AGPL licensed code to code in their SDK, which is under a proprietary license. This led to their new Android app being disqualified from being hosted in F-Droid repos.

Keyguard was supposed to be an open source Bitwarden client, but the dev chose to use a custom proprietary license, so that is source available as well.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Geeze. You literally just refuse to acknowledge sources when they're handed to you. That is just sad.

And if you think that anyone chose to be in some of the worst working conditions known to man just because they can choose between quitting and starving to death, then I'd say that's downright ghoulish.