kid

joined 6 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] kid 6 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Not necessarily. Torrent is a way to find a peer for direct connection or via a relay (of course that is more than that). Syncthing, even using a relay server, requires some ports available for at least outbound connection (22000 TCP/UDP or whatever port the relay is using). This should not be possible in a medium security network, let alone a defense network. I don't know if syncthing works without a direct connection (to the peer or relay, something like transport via http proxy).

[–] kid 6 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Honestly, I didn't think about vulnerability in SyncThing when I read the article. But I wondered why defense forces would have p2p open on their networks.

[–] kid 3 points 3 months ago

By the messages that they are sending to customers, looks like is related to recent updates to the services, but nothing clear.

[–] kid 1 points 3 months ago

IoCs available in the original article.

[–] kid 17 points 3 months ago (16 children)

Please note that the attack can only be carried out if the local network itself is compromised.

[–] kid 1 points 4 months ago

IoCs available here. Some of them with no detection on VT.

[–] kid 0 points 4 months ago

MS involved. Again.

[–] kid 2 points 4 months ago

Of course, in the end it is just conflict, and when it spills over into the real world then you have a war. But this is not always the case We have already had disruption in power grids, nuclear plants, hospitals, public offices, critical infrastructure of financial markets (some of them with impact in real lives) without retaliation in the physical world.

Cyberwar, in my perspective, have some nuances. For instance, in a physical conflict, a hostile nation's invasion of my property immediately becomes a state issue. However, this isn't always the case in a cyberwar if a hostile state invades my organization (It's hard to immediately distinguish whether the actor is a nation state, a financially motivated group, hacktivists, or just a guy who eats pizza in his mom's basement). Most of the time, organizations are on their own.

In a cyberwar, espionage is also far more acceptable. This is something the NSA (and FSB/SVR) has been doing for years (against private entities and states). In a way, I understand that it is something similar to what the cold war was (is), but with no boots on the ground.

[–] kid 2 points 4 months ago

I'd better say that states have been doing this.

[–] kid 1 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Cyber war, of course. I think that there is a cyber war going on for quite some time now. CWWI (Cyber World War I).

[–] kid 1 points 4 months ago

If anyone is still using it, anyways....

view more: ‹ prev next ›