C# is what I primarily write at work, and it’s honestly great to work with. The actual business logic tends to be easy to express, and while I do write a some boilerplate/ceremony, most of it is for the framework and not the language itself. Even that boilerplate generally tends to have shorthand in the language.
jvisick
joined 1 year ago
Hey man, I personally don’t mind it! I like to see people’s updates in their journey to learn something new.
1 hundredweight = (1 qt * 32) + 100.7, of course. It’s very intuitive.
When you use the @rust tag, it creates a post on Lemmy - see here for your post: https://programming.dev/post/2222112
I came across this one just yesterday and while it was convenient at first, I immediately got frustrated when I went to add some parameters and discovered it wasn’t actually curl
https://docs.netlify.com/configure-builds/overview/?#basic-build-settings
You just need to configure your build command and most likely your publish directory. Netlify honestly makes it really easy.
The build command is whatever you’d type in your terminal to compile your react app, and the publish directory is wherever your build command creates your static assets.
“Sorry, our unbelievably massive military budget is only for active duty military. Best we can do is schedule you an appointment to talk to someone next year about the benefits you won’t be receiving.”
“If a student uses the college search tool on CB.org, the student can add a GPA and SAT score range to the search filters. Those values are passed [to Facebook]”
So they don’t associate your official score to your browser, but presumably students who are using that search tool would be searching their real score - or a range close to it.
The headline is fairly leading, but the statement from the College Board is also fairly misleading. They’re not directly selling your official score to advertisers, but they’re indirectly selling data about you that gives a pretty good idea of your score.
I don’t think it’s good enough to have a blanket conception to not trust them completely.
On the other hand, I actually think we should, as a rule, not trust the output of an LLM.
They’re great for generative purposes, but I don’t think there’s a single valid case where the accuracy of their response should be outright trusted. Any information you get from an AI model should be validated outright.
There are many cases where a simple once-over from a human is good enough, but any time it tells you something you didn’t already know you should not trust it and, if you want to rely on that information, you should validate that it’s accurate.
Those look like small cards. But why not just inspect the page and grab the CSS if you’re so focused in re-creating them? Why try to find and shoehorn a component from a UI library to look exactly like that when your browser will tell you exactly how it looks the way it does?
Yeah, and those blood suckers are the richest assholes out there
Building microchips is really hard and Taiwan has held a practical monopoly on the industry for a while now. It’s not that the US doesn’t have educated workers, but it wouldn’t surprise me that it is hard to find many qualified to build the actual facilities to manufacture microchips - most of the US’s involvement in microchips has been designing them and then handing those designs over to Taiwan for manufacturing.