invalidusernamelol

joined 4 years ago
MODERATOR OF
1
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Come at me feds

 

Not really much else to say. Just that I find the similarities funny.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (9 children)

The video is just dumb. She mentions Marx, and fails to even understand that the whole academic concept of Capitalism actually derives from his work and instead acts like Capitalism is just a basic term for an economic system that uses an exchange medium.

She's good with physics, but holy shit does this make her look bad. She needs to actually read something about this topic before opening her mouth.

The whole video is just capitalism == money and buying a banana with money is easier than buying it with the products of your labor. Which again just comes off as incredibly uninformed because that whole argument is addressed and picked apart in the first chapter of Capital.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

She's a physicist that does YouTube videos

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago

It's Volkish

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Hey!

Edit: This guy's cool, I can vouch for him

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

I've already doxxed myself like 100 times here

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Yes, but have you considered that these dangerous bikes might make that necessary suffering caused by cars even worse? Think about the drivers!

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was just summarizing for the people who are too lazy to go read anything and will just stop here

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The conversation was you linking a Wikipedia article, I was at least hoping you'd link like a book or something. Like we could have a discussion if you were trying to argue against authoritarianiam as defined by say Bakunin or some other anarchist thinker.

Then I could respond with On Authority which argues that authority is a natural consequence of any organization and calling something authoritarian just means you're saying that it's a system that is able to successfully reproduce itself.

You could also try to link "authoritarianism" to fascism, but again that is pointless because there's already a term for fascism, which is Fascism.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

POTUS -> TUSP (The United States President)

CIA -> CAI (Central Agency of Intelligence)

FBI -> BFI (Bureau of Federal Investigation)

It's fun to just change around acronyms for official governing bodies. I'm gonna go edit Wikipedia to include these as common abbreviations too

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Socialism: Utopian and Scientific is required reading for any communist

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

All states are authoritarian. Where do you think all the authority comes from?

A state having authority isn't always a bad thing though, the current state is really great if you're a white male property owner!

And those guys won't be too happy if you take that state away from them, so whatever comes next would need the authority to resist that counter-revolution.

But that's authoritarian, so we should just let them take back over and keep doing the authoritarianism that supports their interests.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

I have yet to actually see a big emote, as the hex bear frontend keeps them small, but this comment out of context is great

 

Printed this before the sub closed.

 

My little brother just died. They found him dead on his back porch. Doesn't look like any foul play was involved, but there was a ton of Unisom and Phenibut in his apartment.

I'd never heard of it before today.

 

So I did a bit more research, it seems that there are tons of loan programs under the USDA umbrella. Lots having to do with farming, but also lots having to do with "rural development".

These loans fall under something called the SFH Direct Loan Program (for nonfarm tracts). Which you can read more about here and see the forms here.

There are multiple tiers of these loans and they are all dependent on income and ability to pay. They work almost inverse of a typical mortgage loan where the only thing that matters is your history with on time payments and having at least an average credit score. They start at 3.25% interest for "Low Income" individuals and families (determined by a chart that's bucketed by county). Seems to be between $45k and $65k on average for "Low Income" and the "Very Low Income" group is anyone below the $20k poverty line.

All these income buckets are determined by number of applicants with deductions disabled or child dependants (about $10k taken off your net income per dependent). You can also deduct medical expenses. So the name of the game is trying to figure out how to structure who in your family will be on the loan to get the lowest mortgage rate (1% with the grants for very low income applicants, but these need to be repaid if the house is ever sold).

All these loans are given out directly by the government meaning you don't owe a mortgage to a bank, but to the USDA itself. You have no down payment if you are accepted and are allowed to purchase any "quality" home that's at or below the loan limit for your area (seems to be around $300k plus or minus in most places).

So if you're really desperate and live outside a major metropolitan area, this might actually be an option to break out of the rental hellscape or if you have a bad mortgage and think you'd qualify this might be a way to refinance directly through the federal government.

I'm by no means offering you any financial advice, and an definitely not a financial advisor, but this program seems to genuinely have some merit and honestly I think it could work as a greatly expanded solution to the housing crisis, directly government issued mortgages with downwardly adjustable rates, long terms, and income based grants.

 

We're being booted from our rental because the landlord wants to let his daughter move in and we can't find anything else around here for even remotely the same price. Even rotted out single wide mobile homes are going for $1800/month.

I was turned onto USDA loans by someone and it seems like as long as we make under $65k/year we can qualify for like $336,000 in loans with 0% down.

Is there any catch? The rates seem to start at 3.5% of you're under the $65,000 income limit which would put our monthly payments like $300 below renting.

view more: next ›