This looks new. Needs a lot of work. I looked at the earthquake lights and ball lightning pages and I would have to spend days updating it. That’s the trouble with unknown things, there is a lot that has been tried already that might be relevant towards an explanation but we’re not there yet.
14
Atlas of Mysterious Fairy Circles Shows They're More Widespread Than We Thought
(www.sciencealert.com)
64
'This is complete nonsense': Scientists rail against 'alien' bodies shown before Mexican congress
(www.livescience.com)
19
Good to know! That also makes sense.
(It would be helpful if you could take off the URL link from the entire paragraph, though. It's hard to read this way.)
Actually 1000 is a good number for a sample. It narrows your margin of error to around 3%. If it is truly randomly selected people. But that's the hard part. How you sample skews the results. For example, sampling via land line random phone numbers means you get much older people. Sampling on college campuses means younger, etc.
I'm on Bluesky. It's vapid. Boring. I forget about it, check it once a week and nothing happens except people make a huge deal about cancelling someone. Not worth the hype at all.
OOPS! My bad. When I added the photo for the post, it deleted the news link. Now fixed. Video is available at the link. Sorry.
I’ll take whales jumping over whales dying any day.
Always be tenacious, click on the link. (Now fixed.)
Most things on earth are non-human. Also, Grusch is ridiculous. I'm not going to believe a FOAF story. We had to listen to another tedious nothingburger UFO hearing.
Here is a breakdown of why it's not a lion. https://tetzoo.com/blog/2023/7/20/kleinmachnow-lion-not-a-lion
I looked at the webpage for the event and it looks very much like a tourist draw. Nothing they are doing has any scientific merit. Honestly, believers need to give up trying to find a singular nonexistent monster. That loch has been searched thoroughly.