You were using an analogy where a bully threatens to beat you up and take your money.
No, I wasn't.
That's nothing like the current situation. The current situation is a nuclear armed nation is willing to wage an endless war and we're throwing money and bombs and tanks at the problem trying to make it go away.
No, it's not.
You're comparing small scale things to nuclear scale things and it's really just absurd.
No, I'm not.
Here's what I'm getting from their comments:
"US bad, Russia good. I love Putin and anything that I can pretend is a communist nation, despite not even being slightly close"
Bullies also don't have nuclear weapons.
Uh, yes. Yes they do.
It certainly can be.
It wouldn't be a third party, it would be a replacement party. It's happened many times, and not always with a name change.
All voting is a popularity contest, so I guess you don't like voting or democracy?
They asked for a specific example and you failed to provide one. You had 45 choices and couldn't even pick one?
If you're in the US you haven't lost yet. Still federally illegal, so you're still breaking federal law in legal States.
Good luck, all DRM is evil.
I don't see the relevancy of what you've chosen to quote from this article. Unless you're comparing Sanders campaign donors to Saudi Arabia?
Something someone else wrote.